Random
Source Code
Random
Any person that is irrationally obsessed with 'climate change', 'saving the planet', and reducing carbon emissions for Mother Gaia as soon as humanly possible via deindustrialization, even and perhaps especially at the expense of the production of any necessary goods or services (such as transportation and energy), that are reliant on the extraction of fossil fuels / natural gas / coal etc. It does not matter to them that these goods and services can not easily, if ever, be adequately replaced by 'green' renewables, and that any concerted attempt to transition to them while they remain unviable will cause a worldwide Great Depression as well as a massive drop in individual living standards.
They do not seem to know or care about furthering research into nuclear energy which is actual green energy by comparison to renewables, and have not bothered to do any research into molten salt thorium reactors which take the byproducts of uranium fission reactors and convert them into much less radioactive waste with a half-life of only 300 years instead of tens of thousands.
They are obsessed with recycling, and are usually activistic or at the very least tend towards some kind of climate activism, either by being outspoken about climate change, being a part of a climate group or green party of some kind, or both.
"How dare you." - Greta Thunberg
"Now the candy-haired ecofreaks are targeting Van Gogh's paintings. Do they think Aramco and China Coal will care? For that matter, do they even know these companies exist?" (ecofreak - part 1)
Despite their apparent concern for 'the planet', they never seem to recognize that humans are also a large part of the biogeochemical cycle (aside from pollution) and thus also a part of the planet that should be preserved. Not everyone is compatible with a vegan or vegetarian diet, nor do those diets change anything at all besides one's weakening ones immune system due to lack of meat-based protein.
Chitin (found in bugs) is indigestible to humans, and bugs can also carry many dangerous parasites such as E. coli. The fact that some third-world countries consider bugs a delicacy is not a valid argument, since most of the countries in which that is the case have suffered from genocidal famine.
Nor do they seem to look beyond the surface level of their activism, such as where and how the brands that they love are manufactured or shipped to them (in China, using or by using fossil fuels). Or whether the politicians and celebrities that they support, that publicly on social media genuflect at the climate altar, themselves fly exclusively in private jets, or were otherwise exposed to have ties to (such as by being part of the board of directors of) major oil companies.
Notwithstanding that they are effectively clueless and misinformed about the majority of environmental issues, still somehow they will make it a point to virtue signal to you in some way about their 'enlightened' climate status if you dare disagree with them or view the topic as moot.
"How dare you." - Greta Thunberg
(ecofreak - part 3)
Alternative spelling of istaphobe
A tiny 5 ft 1 woman without superpowers, on screen winning fights against multiple 6 ft 2, 225+ pound men is just not believable Hollyweird, call me an istophobe if you want.
6π 8π
Sarcastic term used ironically in place of 'trauma', signifying 'trauma' according to the perspective of wokies and snowflakes, i.e. when the word is used to describe situations that are not typically considered even remotely traumatic by usual standards. Usable within offshoot words to convey the same meaning, for example, troomatic, troomatized, etc.
"Oh my gawd, this bigoted white male waiter referred to me as a "he" when serving my brunch today! I was traumatized by being reminded of my assigned gender at birth! Doesn't he know that accidentally misgendering a trans woman is hate speech and that words are violence?!
"Probably not, no. I'm sorry about your trooma. Hope you feel better!"
"Lunch was only 30 minutes today, and we also have an extra hour shift. The way us workers get treated is literally, trauma."
"No."
higher education, but intentionally misspelled and pronounced in a wry, ironic manner so as to imply the practical irrelevance of, misprioritization towards, and / or conformity in, obtaining the degree(s) in question.
You use this word when:
1. The degree choice itself is impractical (gender studies, liberal arts, etc).
2. The decision to get a degree at all is impractical and questionable for the person in question (overkill or not needed for the chosen field, unaffordable student loans, bad life timing, etc).
3. You want to subtly hint that the person in question is not intelligent enough for the real world anyway and so higher education would not improve their chances in life, which ties back to #2.
4. You want to not-so-sutbly mock the conformist nature of obtaining a degree for the sake of obtaining a degree, since degrees are now commonplace and everyone and their dog now has one, so they are no longer valuable or exceptional to have aside from ticking a resume box for the 'system'.
So, you're telling me that instead of having a family in your twenties and avoiding the rat-race until you can truly focus on it long-term (when your kids are grown in your forties), you'll get your edumacation so as to pursue your career for corporations that only view you by the profit margins you can make them, and wait until the wall hits in your thirties to realise that climbing the corporate ladder alone is not a particularly fulfilling life path. Got it.
14π 1π
Sarcastic term used to preemptively describe the ad-hominem attacks of woketards that try to invalidate any objective criticism of themselves or their chosen product by labeling any reasonable valid opinion that nonconforms to or does not actively promote the establishment idpol narrative ("The Message") (and by extension anyone that agrees with that opinion), as racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, etc.
Usually done within the context of popular IPs being 'modernized' at the expense of established lore and quality storytelling, which creates strong backlash within the existing fan community, which is then propagandized as 'hate'.
If I say that it's incongruous for there to be black dwarves in the Lord of the Rings by virtue of all dwarves living underground, Twitter will label me as an istaphobe.
120π 19π
A petty, egotistical, and often insidious person that is perpetually deeply resentful, insecure, and jealous towards anyone and everyone that has or appears to have more money, higher status, and / or a better lifestyle than theirs, especially if that someone happens to be younger, more attractive, more intelligent, or comes from a wealthy family.
How well you treat them, and how hard you worked for your money, matters little to a wealthcel.
Wealthcels are usually working class to lower middle class, but they also do exist in the upper income classes. Wealthcels need only perceive themselves to be less successful and wealthy than you.
Wealthcels will usually, if not always, try (and fail) to mask their resentment (at their own insecurities, but they will never admit this to themselves) by engaging in persistent passive aggressive behavior designed to annoy or undermine the person or people they perceive to be undeserving of said higher income, status, quality of life, etc. (at least compared to them and their inflated egos).
On a broader level, they may publicly support the adoption of socialism / marxism / anticapitalism / communism, to try and force everyone else to be as miserable as they are, via government mandate.
Many wealthcels are also incels or borderline incels, due to the correlation between income and SMV.
Now I understand why the wealthy elite live behind walls and gated communities, to get away from potential wealthcels that would resent them for their quality of life.
I would rather do my own laundry than hire a maid.
I don't need some wealthcel 'misplacing' a red sock in the wash with my expensive white linens.