If untrustworthiness and patronizing behaviour (i.e. apparently kind or helpful but betraying a feeling of delusional superiority or ulterior motive to serve selfish interest(s); condescending) was a political philosophy and in some jurisdictions an actual party.
Untrustworthiness, would you trust an individual that learned to talk through a publicly funded school system to be competent enough to philosophize and day dream Libertarianism and convey it to others. Only to turn around, only after they've experienced their free education, to say it's meaningless explicitly or intrinsically through lying, en evidence trying to deny everyone that comes up after them, through the system, the privilege of that system. But going through the additional nefarious step of looking remorselessly in the face and say "i'm trying to help you." That's either psychotic and unchecked asocial or confidence artistry (i.e. con artistry at it's lowest common denominator). If you do, you're gullible.
At this point in our openness, the Furries should not be shy in starting a Political Movement. Because if the Libertarians can do it, the Furries generally have more character and compassion.
Job Applicant comes into a business to hand in her CV:
Manager: "I'll take your resume. Did you know the owner is involved in the Libertarian Movement"
Applicant: "I'll have my resume back, I only have so many of these and I don't to waste them."