Any male anarchist who is feared because he doesn't agree with feminism and thus becomes a target for attack by insecure feminists who project their shortcomings on the manarchist. Often, any allusion to state-enforced abuse where a single male may recount an experience of mistreatment at the hands of the state, which is an indicator of a greater problem affecting multiple men, is met with sarcasm, disparaging remarks and trivialisation of the issue, often portraying them in a manner consistent to that of a frat boy. This happens even when such a male has good reason to feel like the abuse is state-enforced as evidenced by the study carried out by Murray A. Straus and Richard J. Gelles showing that when a woman called the police, in 41.4% (threatened with immediate arrest 28%) of the cases the man was ordered out of the house, but when the man called for the police, the woman was ordered out of the house in 0% (threatened with immediate police arrest 0%) of the cases.
Such feelings are met with contempt and disregard. Case in point, Jack R's and Otter Eliconia's definition.
Jack: Look at the Manarchist complaining about domestic abuse. He just ought to check his privilege. Look at him talking with that dude-bro accent, getting drunk, talking about abuse. How dare he have feelings! How dare he complain!
117👍 138👎
The Happy Humanist Writes "Well, given the fact that Barbie makes 75 Cents for every Dollar that Ken makes, Ken IS in fact a misogynist if he expects Barbie to pay for her dinner when he asked her out.
Also Ken expects Barbie to have a manicure, pedicure and a bikini wax twice a week. He expects her to be young and beautiful, so Barbie spends a shitload of money and time on anti-aging products, clothes and shoes.
Conclusion: Barbie's life is more expensive because she has to buy shit to please Ken and life up to his expectations. Plus she makes less money.".
Well, given the fact that Barbie doesn't work the sewers, garbage collection or anything requiring manual labour, Barbie will simply have to deal with getting 75 cents for every dollar Ken makes. Barbie would, in fact, be a feminist if she believes that Ken should pay for the date since she has a manicure, pedicure and a bikini wax twice a week out of her own volition because that fits in with her professional victimhood as instated by her feminist views.
Conclusion: Barbie is too stupid to realise she's doing it to herself.
Therefore, The Happy Humanist, you're not only an advocate for treating women like children (misogyny), but also of inferior intellect that drives this ridiculous and ill-founded victimhood.
If Ken asks Barbie out for a date, he realises that it's a two-way street where both demonstrate likeable qualities about one another. Contrary to popular belief, Barbie's worth isn't and shouldn't be assumed. Since Barbie used her brains to make a decision, she must be prepared to pay for herself because Ken isn't an ATM machine. misogynist
Peace Out.
133👍 86👎