Random
Source Code
Random
an umbrella-term that scumbags, swindlers, bandits, psychopaths are using to call attacks on them and normalize the abuse of whoever they've chosen to abuse and scare the normies away; if they were to call it revenge-attacks or sabotage - then it creates implication of a reason and therefore more people looking into it and finding the reason and therefore exposing the above peoples and normie ignorance (hence normies are kinda ok with it).
'Terrorizing' something or somebody, which is abuse and fear-inducing threats (and possibly murder) that mostly organized people in position of power, business or in a criminal group use against exploited and abused by them people, or what organized radical political movements use against other political movements.
Sometimes used ironically (regardless of reasoning/just an expression of being annoyed), when someone keeps demanding from or bothering someone.
Murder attempts against the establishment and some sort of guerrilla warfare during 'officially' peace time are typically called terror attacks.
Basically a bias-based term: "whatever we're doing is just, whatever others against us - terrorism".
terrorism is rampant in this country and its schools.
Someone (who is) whose actions are de facto psychopathic/lacking general empathy, but de jure (they are) their actions are considered normal/accepted enough. In other words: de facto they are doing bad things to people (or participating or accomplices in doing), but since the majority (or their local majority) is ok with the targets and the intensity of the bad (and maybe cheering/enabling them) - it's normalized, everyone moves on after this just fine, being used to no accountability.
Same as a tribal psychopath - an umbrella term for abusers (likes witch hunting, bullying, abuse, sadism, marginalization), murderers, but are social or adhering to "the rules of engagement" - working within tribal sets of rules.
Uses schizo logic to justify it - as in whatever in-group fallacies, fantasies, expectations (beyond basic decency), biases, also often feelings-based reasoning.
Usually targets (or joins in on targeting) men, as it's easier to get away with - since women are a 'protected class' and simps already have biased empathy; existing biases against men make it easier to find a cultural moral superiority point and to 'rally the gang' for abuse.
Coliseum visitors; inquisition; mob mentality; labeling; summary executions; genocides; our soldiers are heroes theirs - are evil; wearing a uniform makes a person a legal to murder target or makes their kills acceptable; forced slavery; thinking that Roman empire wasn't a fascist hellhole; certain groups of people deserve to be abused or executed for existing; thinking that karma is a thing; or being a pet owner, believing that they're having "empathy" for animals and it somehow justifies something against humans; and other control freaks, lacking general empathy - are all examples of normie psychopaths.
1. An easily triggered person, even without the intent of offending them. This is either a person with unresolved mental baggage from previous offenses or a person, who is spoiled/unaware to the point of expectation of special treatment in form of courtesy and spending your time/resources on them in excess of basic decency.
2. Projecting oneself onto one's perceptions and interpretations of already fairly vague (and subject to interpretation) historic generalizations or statistics, especially when one has close to none personal involvement in them, and then using it to justify own specific actions. For example: "women have been sexually objectified" therefore I have a right to slap men's butts as they've been "loaning this right" for millennia.
3. Similar to 2. but a lot more cherry picking and ignorant to one's position/not self-aware. For example when a relatively safe and wealthy first world country person - anywhere from the lower middle class or higher - is complaining about being an oppressed minority, while not really being either a minority nor abused nor as 'systematically and unfairly limited' as they claim to be, in fact, it's likely to be, in some ways, the opposite and they're just an overly egotistical individual.
4. The term could also be used to ridicule - by abusers for the sake of promoting normalization of their former abuses and ignorant normies - their ignorance of witnessing abuse.
hugh mungus what? - you have victim mentality
18👍 5👎
Being in a 'stockholm syndrome' relationship with capitalism and brainwashed to hate any social policies, while being lower economic class. A naive optimistic capitalist, that likes to pretend they're the upper class or that 'everyone gonna be if.. *blames person's choices*'.
Often is a corpa simp and simping for any lucky wealthy person. Easily buys into authority fallacy.
- I'm gonna move to LA and be rich!.. - You just gonna be homeless, drooling over rich peoples fences and cars.
- I'll work harder at my dead-end job and be like my boss.. - Whose parents helped them become financially independent with a small "loan" with no repayment dead-end.
- I'll start OF.. - You're a man good luck with that without getting canceled.
- I'll invest in stonks.. - And gamble your last 1k$ away or, at best, make 20$ after inflation, fees and taxes.
Keep coping, copeitalist.
It is derived from "normal people" as they are considered the majority of people.
Tend to consume something popular, because others are doing it, to be like others.
A person, who's been living their whole life mostly within the boundaries of "social rails", the working middle class, typically spoiled by relative early financial and social safety (not pauper parents, not bullied much past elementary school - basic infantile stuff, has not been influenced much by any peer sadists or criminals).
In most cases they are ignorant , not independent thinkers, so they tend to accept whatever view is the least controversial or exposing and the majority is thinking or promoting, that requires the least thought from them, they don't apply the rules of science (they don't scrutinize morality, themselves, don't question everything).
Normies=Tribal people, morality is defined by their tribe or they can find a tribe that aligns with theirs. Super-tribe contains general alignments between different groups of normies. Abuse (which is both sadistic & psychopathic) is also a probing tool used to check if a person is part of any tribe and if current tribe's members reactions are aligned (alignment of in-group biases/morals); while people that are abused often are either marginalized non-tribals or marginalized tribes - not part of a supertribe.
- Have you heard of the new fifa coming out? / Any content with violence in it causes violence! / People shoot others, because they are just depressed posers! / Homeless people are just lazy and should just get educated, just get a job and just buy a house. / Why didn't I know about this one person being sort of abused on the other side of the planet until this BBC report!? this is outrageous.
- You're such a normie.
People who own pets (not including farming and herding) like to believe, that they have empathy, but in reality it's arrogance and egotism - they just enjoy the control it provides them via the natural power difference.
Aww such a cute kitty and doggo I would love to force breed 471million of dogs and 373million of cats and force them to live on my terms at my place for no other reason but my mental pleasure, satisfaction and maybe a weapon against other people, I'm such a nice and empathetic pet owner.
2👍 9👎
An idiosyncratic internet joke, specific to any combination of community, person, media, event. It can be a self-containing image, collage, animation, video, or inserted into another media. Sometimes a meme character or short animation becomes an emote on streaming sites.
Just like other jokes, it can become cringe, when explained or forced, or bullying, when forced.
Saving potions during a game playthrough for later, but never using them, so you end up with a stash at the end of the game, is a meme at this point.