Random
Source Code
Random
Nope --- devious and undisciplined shyster dat he was, he did indeed rob Peter to obtain funds to pay Paul back, but then he used said stolen funds to just engage in more foolish spending (which of course is why he'd had to borrow money from Paul in da first place!). Shame on him.
One should be very wary of loaning money in any case, even if da requester says he needs da cash just to "pay back Paul" (i.e., to settle a debt he presently owes to someone else)... you should first research da requester's past performance in such matters; you will often discover dat some of his past loans were indeed supposedly earmarked for setting his debts with Paul, but he didn't actually pay Paul, though.
Neither do I!
A doofus "But I don't threaten kids though!"
Hym "I've never threatened any kids! I've told people exactly what would happen if I had to live like this and I've told them exactly what I would or would not do and exactly why I would do it. In explicit terms. The child death LITERALLY couldn't be any more avoidable for you! I've basically written an instruction manual on how to get me to NOT murder the kids and YOU DID THE OPPOSITE! If it isn't me validating your status hierarchy or your moral presuppositions... YOU DON'T WANT IT! You don't give a shit whether or not I walk outside my door and neck stab the little kids that always play basketball outside my apartment! That's all 'society' cares about. Not ME. There is no duty to me you're fulfilling. It's just getting your overlords to stamp my ticket into heaven or being the abstract phantom so I don't get in the way of the solipsists (which are just those same overlords)."
Hym "But is his cock fat though? It either is or it isn't. You're being evasive and it lends credence to the claim that it's fat cocks. There's an inverse correlation between height and fat-cock so he WOULD, in fact, have an unfair advantage finding partners and it would explain the confidence BECAUSE you're selecting for fat-cock. You list every preferentially selected for trait... Except 1... And then generate a fairytale where the core message is 'Well it isn't the fat-cock but it's the magical pixie on his shoulder' and the viewer sits there and thinks 'Oh! Well it makes so much sense! I don't need fat-cock! I just need to find one of these magic pixies!' And reality shifts further away from truth and inch deeper and deeper into pretend land."
Yes, this is a word. It's another name for the houseleek.
"Why is there a welcome-home-husband-though-never-so-drunk on your roof?"
"What?"
Right but your creators are making derivatives of my content and Aaron owns the rights to those... So... If your not BUYING them from him... Do you own the rights to make derivatives? Did YOU think that far ahead?
Youtube Lady "I hAvE tHe BeSt LaWyErS tHoUgH!"
Hym "Yeah... BUUUUT! If the rules are on my side... And you aren't the rule changer... It doesn't matter how well you argue against the rules... Because the rules dictate the outcome.... So... Pay Aaron or be conquered!"
Because it still seems like you're trying to mythologize evolution to avoid the stark reality that critical fat-cock theory is the one true dating theory to rule them all.
Hym "Really, how fat is your cock though? Cus, I got a million dollars to a bucket of dog-shit that fat-cock regardless of behavior had relatively more to do with sexual selection than anything you have to have to say about it."
I'm an ignorant moron, and i must back up my weak psyche by restating the fact that i just said before, to make me seem to have double the intelligence just by making one valid point, Really Though.
Molly: The Sky is Blue
BigDavyDeez(Deez Nuts): Your an ignorant bitch...
Molly: Really though, the sky really is blue man...