Random
Source Code
Random
emo;<i> masculine:</i> it is boys who wear womens jeans, sport a backward mullet (aka emo hair)dyed black and question their sexuality whilst litening to any form of emotional (deep or shallow, generally involving heartbreak), tear inducing, heroin shooting (or pretending/appearing to others to do hard drugs), thick glasses and saucony wearing to support the crazy midset of their narcissistic/self loathing (somehow?) selves in order, of course, to get laid by the opposite sex (whilst still questioning, usually outloud, their homosexuality)
emo: <i>feminine</i> girls who have decided that dressing in the female version of the emo boy style will get them some wang of the opposite sex. Female emo people generally have black bobs and short bangs, such as in the French indie film, Amelie and spend their time not crying over emo music, but the emo boy from which they are estranged due to a) drugs b) sexuality issues c) his band d) impotency due to serious depression due to emo music.
Example: Connor Oberst, whilsts still considered indie rock has become poster child for sad boys with the same haircut.
11👍 28👎
This theorem states that any woman in the age of 12-22 , that has a father figure absent shall be a discord whore / egirl who talks to a minimum of 7 guys and a maximum of 18.2 relationships annually to get there attention act like you are a father figure and you shall win that ass
The Fatherless Feminine Theorem (FFT) helped me pull a fatherless e girl!
1👍 2👎
Typically used for a person who dances to Next Level by Aespa, crosses his legs, and has very delicate hand movements.
E. Yang brings out novel femininity.
Typically used for a person who dances to Next Level by Aespa, crosses his legs, and has very delicate hand movements.
E. Yang brings out novel femininity.
Another term for a woman's period.
Feminine chili on the toilet seat again?!?!
A "direct correlation" would mean a correlation of 1. A correlation of 1 is as high as it gets. So I highly doubt the correlation between porn and WHATEVER is 1. A correlation of .7 is HIGH in terms of correlation (apparently). So high that Jordan Peterson cites the correlation when he's talking about the relationship between wealth and sexual selection success. But don't feel bad. You're not the only one using correlation wrong!
Hym "They need to retitle that video 'feminine woman DOESN'T DEBUNK FUCKING ANYTHING.' Oh shit... Have I been using correlation wrong? Oh shit! That means the correlation between fat cocks and sexual selection success can be HIGHER than .3! HOLY SHIT! I've google that word live 12 different times! How am I just now getting that!? Shit, it could even be higher than .7! What's more, there can be an inverse correlation between 2 things. You could have a correlation between fat cocks and reproductive success that it like 1 AND a correlation between baby dicks and reproductive success that is like -1. What do the studies say? Is there a study? What's the correlation between fat cock and success? It's high. I bet you 1 million dollars it's higher than .7! WE'RE BACK IN HERE! CRITICAL FAT-COCK THEORY! I look like an idiot for using it wrong but WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS is that I COULD BE MORE RIGHT THAN I THOUGHT I WAS! I could be MORE RIGHT THAN JORDAN!"
When a transmasculine or FTNB person has that little dash of unwanted femininity from being raised as a female since birth.
Darn my lingering femininity, why do I still like this stuff?