Random
Source Code
Random
Isn't exactly what the common perception of it would suggest. See example:
Guy 1: oh man, 'rule 34' this shit STAT, it would be so FUNNY, think of how many childhoods it'll ruin!
Guy 2: *jacking it to assorted rule34 images*
Guy 1: *jacking it to assorted rule34 images*
55👍 293👎
Involving sexual//explicit things of said person.
Person being told has porn on the internet.
Girl: I still play "the gameeee"....
Boy: But there is also porn of you...
Girl: blank stare
Boy: Rule 34
Girl:......no comment.....
19👍 94👎
If it exists, there is porn of it. No exeptions.
From 7chan. Often users will take the miccy and send things gross, such as 100+ adult pornography, or some sicko would say "CHILDREN UNDER 10! RULE 34, GOOO" often with an awful lot of spam to show how stupid they actually are.
OLD GRANNIES BEING SHAGGED, RULE 34!
Guy: I watched power rangers last night, the pinks one's hot
Guy2: RULE 34 ON TEH BLUE ONEZ!
Guy3: *Posts a picture saying "GTFO"*
Guy: Nice one, Guy3!
105👍 755👎
It's the more explicit version( like hentai, furry porn, etc) of deviant art, and if you don't know deviant art is your shit out of luck. It's all good and well until it's about a show you watched when you were a kid ( or better you sick fuck ).
" Dude I got a boner looking at Paw Patrol heat, on Rule 34."
" You're a fucking piece of shit human"
1👍 3👎
That one rule on the internet for a select "cultured" people
Rule 34 will shatter the souls of the unenlightened
1👍 2👎
Originally circulated on 4chan by members of Anonymous, in which the rule was formulated as "if it exists, there is porn of it". (Thanks Google!)
Of course there's porn of FNAF, as said in Rule 34 of the internet!
34👍 1👎
On the Internet, one who posts sexually explicit material on a non-porn website is usually saw as a rule breaker. He may get banned, but sometimes they escape. Jerks and ohter guys will make jokes aside on this and say that X broke Rule 34, meaning he posted porn in a normal non-NSFW tag.
3👍 14👎