Random
Source Code
Random
Something to call someone when they're being super gay.
Joey: Yo Chad, that guy is a real Boatshoes Peterson!
Chad: Yeah, look at him go!
3👍 1👎
A happy-go-lucky person that can shine your door everytime he talks to you. He doesn't care who you are, as long he gets the equal respect that he wants from you, just don't pull up his relationships because he can talk about it for days.
He may be happy, but he is a very closed person when it comes to his depression. He rather not talk about it so don't force him. Not alone he needs love from everybody, because he watch anime in his room alone. He also have so many exs that want him back because he was the only nicest person to let them run all over him. He doesn't the true definition of love, so he will date anyone that who loves him back.
Plus, he is also depressed, easily. He doesn't show it in school or any other places because he doesn't want to worry people close from him. But at home, he cries in his sleep, not loudly but sliently. All he cries about his fear of being forgotten or not being loved enough to feel not worthless. So, if you see him online or at any other places, talk to him.
"Hey, you are a very cool person, Cordell Peterson!"
"Haha! Thanks, you too!"
3👍 1👎
A word often used to describe a shemale with a small dick and large tits. In real life they should never be approached.
Did you see that Curtis Peterson on PornHub's Porn Of The Week?
3👍 1👎
fucking dick who murdered his wife and unborn child because he was secretly a fag
dude 1: did you hear about Scott Peterson?
dude 2: yeah, what a fucking dick!
11👍 11👎
A logical fallacy where one of the sides attempts to discredit the opposition by painting the other side as incapable of arguing on the topic, by pointing out a source about the topic (which is mostly too long to skim through in a short time) and stating that they must scan the said source extensively before they can talk about the said topic.
It is a combination of "red herring" and projected "self-incredulity" intended to act as a setback for the opposition or to cut off the exchange by saying "You don't understand this topic well enough to talk about it".
It is named after "Jordan Peterson" as he is often known for using this tactic.
Example 1
-----------------------
Representative A: I wouldn't want to drop a Jordan Peterson here, but reading the work of (insert author/thinker) named (insert source/research name) is a must if we want to discuss this.
Example 2
-----------------------
Debator 1: It is not morally acceptable to suggest that the concept of human emotions can be put under an objective standard.
Debator 2: Well, in the work of "Sam Harris" named "The Moral Landscape", he talks about this topic extensively as to why this argument can be made. The suggested reasoning is not to divert our focus into utilitarianism, but to use it to identify what is beneficial for our well-being, which Sam Harris defines as the source of moral thinking.
Debator 1: I would have to disagree with that reasoning, and for that, I will be referring to (insert a counterpoint source or research). The reasoning of Q (author or thinker of the counterpoint) shows how your argument falls to pieces when faced with their deduction.
Debator 2: If you could elaborate on their reasoning, perhaps we can talk more about the topic and expand upon our debate through that.
Debator 1: I mean I could, but I don't think condensing a 600-page study into a few sentences can do it justice. And not to mention that we don't have the time tonight to go over all of the contents.
Debator 2: How are we supposed to continue our exchange then?
Debator 1: Read it, all of it, and come back. Then we can continue.
4👍 3👎
To shut down an angry, extreme feminist with pure logic, words only, non-physical. (No women were harmed in the making of this statement)
I was speaking to this girl at the bar and she started bringing up loads of extreme feminist views, so I gave her a Peterson Punch.