Random
Source Code
Random
A person with a IQ of 5000 and can read the rubix cube backwards there are two types of piers your peers who are supposed to be your equals but we all know that if your name is Piers your better than them. Piers also has a 95% chance of likening milk Your also a gamer if your a Piers You PP is massive according to dank memer and your cool!
He just single Handedly dunked on our whole team what a Piers
Look at this little girl who killed herself! Is it your fault this little girl killed herself? It IS isn’t! You kill little girls!
Hym “Wooooooow Piers! Standing on children’s graves to make a point... AGAIN! That is wild! You’re almost as dishonest as Dr. Peepeestones! Hilarious!”
Unless you're on my side. Which I can also see. In which case, he's correct. I have to be allowed to get a handle on what's being alledge about me.
Hym "But if Piers is on my side, that means you ARE a plant! Damnit Andy! But yes. This would be the fault of people spreading lies. You're supposed to be on my side!"
Yep. Dishonest or not very bright. I mean... Relative to me, no one is that but still. Bur you've backpedal on some of the Palestine stuff so at least you're not entirely beyond reason.
Hym "Yes, Piers. Dishonest. I don't remember in relationship to what though... Probably covid or Trump... At first the Palestine Tate interview but you're clearly coming around. Aslo, how you engage with the trans topic is fundamentally dishonest and the people you have on to debate the trans side are fucking tomato-cans. They suck. They suck at that. Not even a little bit good at it. They look like idiots. They are idiots. And you only have them on when you need someone to look like an idiot for the conservatives. I mean, I was watching Destiny (And you likely thing he's good at defending the position) on it and even he is sub-par. And he isn't 'pointing out hypocrisy' he's engaging in the reductio ad absurdum fallacy. Meaning he's misrepresenting the premise of argument. By asking whether or not you can ARBITRARILY identify as a black man you insinuate both that THAT is what the transgenders are doing (arbitrarily identifying) and presupposing that there are no males whose internal being, their psyche, aligns more with what we would commonly associate with the term 'Woman.' You're also ignoring entirely the shift in nomenclature that refers to the social elements of personhood as 'Gender' and the biological elements as 'Sex.' And what you do is pick the people least capable holding their position and then use fallacy as evidence for the false of their proposition. And it works because both you and people are dumb as dogshit."
Making a plan for a social event (e.g. a stag do) then not showing up when everyone else does.
"Where's Steve, isn't it his birthday?"
"Yeah, I think he's done a Piers"
is so fucking sus i swear to god hes so sus like hes the gayest person in the group