An argument in which a person with an absurdly high IQ taunts another person, whose IQ is slightly (but significantly) lower, until the latter person cracks and storms out in a fit of anger (usually takes all of 30 seconds)
Fiona: Man, did you see Jono storm out of here before?
Hannah: Yeah, don't worry about that, we just had a Jono Argument
"nice argument. unfortunately, fill in the blank"
if you're in the middle of a disagreement online, sending a message in this format will immediately ruin the recipient's argument, and most likely their life. use only as a last resort. examples below
nice argument. unfortunately, 192.168.1.45
nice argument. unfortunately, your mother is obese
nice argument. unfortunately, I have a grenade launcher
nice argument. unfortunately, you probably eat at Burger King for lunch every day
A regular argument in which the general topic at hand is unimportant but is still treated as if it actually is in some aspect, usually by the person/people who initially sparked the conversation in the first place. In most cases Cold-Fire Arguments get extremely heated for no other reason for the sake of the discourse rather than the actual topic.
"Why did we even decide to go along with that whole conversation last night? We got nowhere I ended with a shitty feeling afterward."
"It was a Cold-Fire Argument, that's why."
A large clump of text sent in one message in an online argument. It is usually a long, formulated message used to support their argument, however it is pointless, since this is the internet, and no one wants to read something that big, so everyone ignores them.
"Wow, that moron's been typing for 10 minutes now, seems he's typing an argument bible or something."
Having an argument through a messenger.
So Sarah could say something to Steve than Steve says that to Iron Man than Iron Man gives a response to Steve, who then relays that to Sarah. Repeat to infinity.
After Iron Man killed Steve's dog, they got in a proxy argument through Sarah.
A rebuttal used in a debate or argument purely for the intent to overly simplify their opponent's point, even purposefully misinterpreting it.
An example being if A is critical of the president then B can say "you only believe that because your candidate lost the election." The statement can either be true or false, but it's use is to end A's argument. The rebuttal does not actually do anything for the purpose of debate.
"I can't handle talking to fans of the Star Wars sequels. Anytime I say I didn't like it they use the shut-down argument 'you only hate it because what you predicted was wrong.'"
an argument so intense and loud usually in all caps, its best fitted with giornos theme in the backround
*sleepy makes a definition of me being a simp*
me: WHAT THE FUCK BRO I AINT A SIMP. YOUR ABOUTA START A JOJO ARGUMENT MAN
Sleepy: YES YOU ARE YOU SIMP FOR MONGEY GIRL
me: NO I DOONT ID MUCH RATHER BE DOING SOMETHING LIKE D&D THAN SIMPING FOR A WOMAN
sleepy: I DONT BELIEVE YOU.
*jojo music starts playing*
me: YOU LITERALLY TALK TO CERA WHILE WE GAME
sleepy: NOT TRUEEE
me: WE WHERE PLAYING BEDWARS AND YOU DECIDE TO CALL HER
me: BROS BEOFRE HOES REMEMBER??
sleepy: I SAID THAT TO YOU FIRST WHEN YOU SIMPED FOR CERA
me: YOU OPENLY ADMITTED TO LIKING HER
SLEEPY: IT WAS A JOKE
ME: SURE BUDDY FUCKIN WHORE FUCKER
SLEEPY: STUPID ASS CUNT
ME: FUCK YOU
SLEEPY: THATS THE BEST YOU COULD COME UP WITH???
ME:YOU LITERALLY DM ME ABOUT BEING HORNY TO ANIME BITCHES
SLEEPY: WTF DONT SAY THAT
ME: SORRY MAN. OK LETS JUST STOP FIGHTING
*jojo musc ends*