When you make an amzing save as a goalie during a hockey game.
"And theshot by Jagr! And he is stoned like a hippy!"
14π 25π
a term describing someone who has an over-the-top reaction to small annoyances. also known as apricot-boy.
Oh my god why are you such a stone-fruit???
1π 8π
I would totally stone bone him again.
1π 8π
80 earth pounds, unlike the rest of the world where it equals 14 pounds. This is due to the fact that people from Minnesota lie 'bout most everything and claim everything is from Minnesota
Mike: "Not only is Jimmy Carter from St. Paul, he weighs 2 stone."
Doug: "EU Stone?"
Mike: "Minnesota Stone, a slighly heavier variant of the EU Stone."
2π 24π
the 12 stone eyelids are a band based in north belfast
yeo the 12 stone eyelids
3π 3π
The above definition of the "nuts" is incorrect. The nuts is the best possible hand. So, contrary to the above, if a straight flush (or full house, etc.) is possible, then an ace-high (non royal) flush is *not* the nuts. If someone says they have the nuts but another possible hand could beat them, they are wrong.
Things I am not sure about (below refers to holdem):
1) Often (but not always) the nuts = "nuts, given the face up cards" and does *not* (this is the controversial point) demand that all the cards 5 community are showing; i.e., in holdem, it is often thought possible to have the nuts on the flop (and/or turn), even if another hand could improve to beat you (but no hand can now beat you).
NB: If one can have the nuts with more cards to come, we can perhaps distinguish between nuts and "unbreakable" nuts. The question is if all nuts are (implicitly) unbreakable.
2)Stone cold nuts means either A) unbreakable nuts, and/or B) un-tie-able nuts; The nuts that not only cannot be beat, but cannot be tied. If I have the nut straight, I cannot be beat, but I can be tied. If I have the nut flush, I cannot be tied.
I have heard stone cold nuts = to nut hand that cannot be tied *and* wins the entire pot. But, it seems like the stone cold nuts might fail to win the entire pot, if one is all in with them before the side pots are built. So, I donβt like this definition.
Basically, SCNs > Nuts, but I can think of three ways they could be better: a) unbreakable, b) un-tie-able, c) entire-pot-winning. If we conclude c is wrong, and if we go with b, that allows us to have: nuts, unbreakable nuts, stone cold nuts, and STONE COLD UNBREAKABLE NUTS. All delicious to squirrels like me.
Finally, there are the two possible histories behind "nuts"... 1) source of pleasure, or 2) wild west poker players would put their wagon axle nuts on the table when they wanted to prove that their bet was good b/c they would not be able to drive away if they lost (and would then have to pay their debt). If you like the wild west version, then maybe you might also think that people would only play "the nuts" if nuts were always unbreakable, if tie-able (thus, nuts = you can't break this, stone cold = you can't even tie this). So, can your nuts be broken?
Royal flush = stone cold nuts (assorted, all kinds of nuts).
10π 18π
A glamorous actress from the past who is almost certainly dead by now.
"I saw that Sally Mansfield on the Bilko show.What a stone cold stunner!"
17π 39π