Random
Source Code
Random
1. Thinking something could not possibly go wrong and then it does
Man 1 : Titanic could never possibly sink
Man 2 : You think?
5 mins later
People : The Titanic is sinking!
Man 1 : Sod's Law
26👍 22👎
Loosely based on Godwin's Law, Balfour's Law states that whenever an Israel or Jewish thread takes place online and a poster performs a threadjack by stating that Israel never should have existed in the first place, said poster automatically looses the argument and the thread is effectively over. When used in conjunction with Godwin's Law, poster will thereafter be know as an "asshat," and will be prone to ridicule and or biatch slapping on any thread in which he or she posts.
"Here we were talking about hot IDF chicks and this douche nozzle had to go and invoke the wrath of Balfour's law. What a mouth breather."
20👍 16👎
1.Complex set of laws about disasters, but leads down to "Anything that can go wrong will."
2. Not fucking Mrs. Murphy
1. My computer died and took my term paper with it!
2. Man, you gotta hide me, Gennady, I just boned Mrs. Murphy and Mr. Murphy has the gun!
16👍 12👎
A person who refuses to do something that might or might not be illegal simply because of the perceived implication that it is. This individual will often "call out" another person for performing said illegal behavior. He/she might also report illegal behavior to the popo.
ME: Hey G, want to take David to go gang banging?
FRIEND: Nah Cuz, Dave be a mega fucking Law Dog holmes.
ME: Hey man, want to shoot off some illegal fireworks?
LAW DOG: No way, those are illegal for a reason. They could hurt someone you know?
ME: Alright, then screw off.
LAW DOG: If you shoot those off, I'm going to have to report it. Sorry bro, but laws keep this country together.
17👍 14👎
tram-law, wal-mart backwards means "im gay" in latin
guy A: let go to walmart
guy B: you mean tramlaw? you must be gay
74👍 76👎
Terry's Law
Based on Godwin's Law which states that: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
This adage shows that when an online discussion about the legalisation of certain drugs is created, it is inevitable that someone will instantly pipe in and state how it is really unfair that Alcohol, Tobacco and Caffeine are legal, while Cannabis, Cocaine and Heroin are still illegal in most places.
After a certain amount of time, the discussion becomes cyclical and utterly pointless, with both sides being completely unmoved by the arguement put forward by the opposing side.
Many will argue that prohibition has been proven to fail and point ot the rise of criminal gangs in early 20th Century United states of America, through illegal distillation and distribution of alcohol, coupled with speakeasies.
The other side will often point out that the prohibition of many recreational drugs is in the interest of the safety of the majority of the population.
Basically, and again in a similar vein to Godwin's law, this law states that the first person to argue for the legalisation of certain recreational drugs by using alcohol, tobacco or caffeine as a reference point instantly loses the arguement.
User 1: All drugs should be legal.
User 2: Boo hoo. I can't get any good coke because my stupid government have made it illegal, but they let people drink beer.
User 3: Another example of Terry's Law.
6👍 3👎
a law that states when you "make up a guy to get mad at" that guy really does exist
I made up a person who got mad at people who are in relationships with people that like cartoons because it makes them child coded. And then I saw a tweet saying this very same thing in earnest the next day. Another classic example of Awls Law in action.
7👍 3👎