Random
Source Code
Random
A cat pooping out a rainbow through space
its an addicting song
lyrics:
nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan
Repeat till you die
Nyan cat: nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan
Me:YAY *Japaneese laugh and eats pocky*
24👍 6👎
A male who thinks he is superior in size and knowledge when around others. Second to none with his shoulders broad and head held high he is the vision of perfection - in his own mind. Believes he is top of the food chain. Big Cat slays women with ease as they are drawn to him by the glow of his skin and the twinkle/tears in his eyes.
Big cat Man whore Big cat Tiger Big cat Conceded big cat Crush Minute cat Maide
77👍 26👎
A vagina, usually not the most sanitary.
Damn Maria, your fish tank smells like your gran-mammys cudi cat!
21👍 5👎
an affectionate name for a vagina
I licked her cat flaps all night
45👍 15👎
Is a cat in an isolated box that has a 50% chance of getting killed in the next hour due to a quantum event - such as a particle decaying with 50% chance, and which will release a poison that will kill the cat. If the particle does not decay, then cat will remain alive.
Schroedinger/Einstein claimed that after an hour with the box lid closed, the cat must be either dead or alive, each with 50% probability - this is just common sense. Bohr/Heisenberg claimed that with the lid closed, the cat is neither alive nor dead, but 50% alive AND 50% dead at the same time. That is the cat is in 2 mutually exclusive states at the same time!
Bohr's position is the "Principle of Superposition" and is central to quantum physics.
Empirical experments show that Bohr was correct, and Schroedinger wrong - up to a point. If the observer happens to be in the box, he will see what Schroedinger asserts. If the observer is out of the box and cannot see inside the box, then Bohr is right.
So Bohr and Schroedinger were both neither right nor wrong! What irony. The answer is "who is asking". Is the observer privy (entangled) with the cat or not. Note: this is unrelated to the popular concept that "the observer influences the observed". There is no influence by the observer.
You are both right and wrong just like Schroedinger's cat
46👍 14👎
Cat face has a big cat face, with the body of a cat, and the face of a cat, and he flies through the air because he's got a cat face.
Basically one giant head and a little body, cat face is a minimally anthropomorphic cat which can talk in a French accent but thinks that moths are legal tender and that rubbing something with his face makes it his. Gives sage advice to those that need it. Also tends to be a bit long-winded.
*looking for something to eat*
Cat face: There is no ash flavored with fish in here. There is no poopy wood products favored with beef. What is this? This is no good for me. I must go to the shops, yes.
Cat face: See? I'm rubbing you. There you go. You safe in here. You belong to me.
Old lady: This is a lovely room dearie, but I need to go get my pension.
How about those ash treats shaped like a fish, so you are under the illusion you are eating a fish, but you are not. You are eating the ash.
Store clerk: Not today, no.
Cat face: But ash is very important in my diet! And to my people too! What are you, some sort of catist? That's right, yes, I said it.
Store clerk: We've got real meat treats you kn...
Cat face: You are very funny. You talk, but all I hear is silliness.
Cat face: Cleaning products should be bought from a store, kids, not for the silly prices on your doorstep. 4.99 for scrubbing gloves? What are they made of, huh, diamonds? You should hope not, because that would be scratchy, like my claw.
126👍 48👎