Random
Source Code
Random
Like this definition if the following is true: none of the above.
Don’t rate this definition if the following is true: all of the above.
Answer! Let’s look at the text on the top. It says none of the below, meaning the middle text and bottom text shouldn’t be true. The top text states that the middle text is actually false, meaning that the top text is proving itself correct. Let’s consider the top text may be true, so the middle text can’t be true. Now if we take the bottom text, it can’t be correct as we already know the middle text is false. That means we have to dislike this definition. The top text says “Dislike this definition if the following is true: none of the below.”
1👍 3👎
True inner gangster.
Tr-ue--in-er--gang-ster
Just another word for thug basically.
GANK GANK
let me stab this kid so I can see his true inner gangster blood.
True inner gangster.
Tr-ue--in-er--gang-ster
Just another word for thug basically.
GANK GANK
let me stab this kid so I can see his true inner gangster blood.
Someone who has never watched any Star Wars movies or had any interest is seeing any.
The true sinner professed their superiority but was trying to tell me who shot first.
When you wanna know if something is true.
Person 1: Person 3 killed 4 people!
Person 2: Oh my god person 3 is that true?
Person 3: What you expect me to say lol
he who is the true champion... only the true champion knows who is the true champion. Only candidates for true championship may compete for the true championship..
i.e. You are not the true champion because if you were you would not be looking up the definition.
Ian is not the true champion. Neither is Tim....
The ratio of upvotes awarded to a commenter compared to upvotes awarded to an original poster (OP) weighted for each user's follower count. TAR adjusts for engagement for both parties. True Adjusted Ratio is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ), where a value >1 is considered a "W"
Strengths:
- TAR reflects the true impact of a comment in unbalanced interactions. Comments with fewer followers are augmented, further amplifying OP's humiliation.
- It is possible for a commenter with fewer followers than OP to have fewer upvotes than OP and still obtain a "W".
Limitations:
- True Adjusted Ratio assumes followers of each account are supportive. It does not take into account "hate-followers".
- TAR fails to take virality into account. A comment is more likely to receive engagement during the time when a post is most viral, after which engagement in both original post and comment deteriorate at different geometric rates.
- TAR calculation does not account for downvotes or tertiary responses. While TAR is a more accurate measure in social media spaces with upvote-only rating systems (e.g. Twitter), ratio calculations may be redundant in spaces which use an upvote/downvote system (e.g. Reddit). Tertiary reactions that are ambiguous (e.g. Facebook) are not factored into this calculation.
- "Premium account" algorithms (such as Elon Musk's blue-check model on Twitter) artificially alter views, skewing engagement in favor of paid subscribers.
True Adjusted Ratio: TAR
OP: Original Post
Folₒₚ: Followers of OP
UVₒₚ: Upvotes for OP
Fol꜀: Followers of commenter
UV꜀: Upvotes for commenter
If a user with 100 followers (Folₒₚ = 100) receives 40 upvotes (UVₒₚ = 40) and a comment from a user with 1000 followers (Fol꜀ = 1000) receives 50 upvotes (UV꜀ = 50), traditional calculation would consider OP "ratioed" using traditional calculation:
R = UV꜀/UVₒₚ = 50/40 = 1.25
R > 1, thus OP would be ratioed
However, since OP's follower count is 1/10th that of the commenter's, the True Adjusted Ratio (TAR) is calculated as follows:
TAR = (Folₒₚ)/(Fol꜀) x (UV꜀)/(UVₒₚ) = 100 / 1000 x 50 / 40 = 0.1 x 1.25 = 0.125,
TAR < 1, thus OP would not be ratioed.