Random
Source Code
Random
Further on, Jerry has been banned from discord due to not having the age to be in it according to his country laws, and Ejm shadow has replaced his charge temporarily, the game got brand new admins in training, such as Nicholas, Astric, Medh, and a few more. At the start everything was fine with them, but further on, some other admins from the first generation started getting **way** more strict within the rules. We could not say a single word and that would be warn worthy. And the new admins (excluding Medh) would just give you nonsense excuses in order to keep someone banned, or not do their work properly. Most likely the staff was power thirsty, and would get offended/mad over inoffensive jokes, such as "ok and" + "your mom", which even leaded to the delition of an emoji in particular which would most likely go along with both of those sentences regularly. And this is where the community was not the same anymore, with people getting banned over jokes, warned because of images that were not even considered memes in general, and overall stuff that were not bad enough in order to give the user a punishment. But, after some time, JerryCookies decided to make a brand new recreation of Utmv, called Utpr (standing for Undertale - Paralel Realities.), which would be ran by Jerry' himself, but we've met a "terrible fate".
Continue in UTMV (Generation 3)
Person 3: Ah, UTMV miss the memories...
Person 4: It's the past now, everything good comes to an end. Let's go back inside it's about to rain.
UTMV (Generation 2) Part 2
When you date a girl and in 2 months if she doesn’t give you the first hole or second hole y’all have a problem known as 2-1-2 law
U date a girl and in 2 months she has to let you fuck her in the sass or pussy 2-1-2 law
Genius math equation. Invented by the
mathematician big shaq.
Math teacher: 2+2 is 4 minus 1 thats 3 quick math.
Me: mom, are you ok?
Inter-subjectively
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."