Random
Source Code
Random
"Someone who won't shut up if they aren't given a source"
"they will ignore everything what you say until they have a source"
Man A: "Last evening I was having a debate online, but the other wouldn't stop asking about a source."
Man B: "They sound like a massive debate lord"
19👍 16👎
The one who is indeed the best at masterbating
betty: "I hear the jack is the best a masterbating. They call him the master debater."
kate: "what an honor..."
37👍 31👎
a common term used by conservatives so autistic they need someone to waste their time spouting obvious shit to them
"you think LGBT people are humans? HA! Silly libturd! debate me!"
29👍 22👎
A presidentila debate is a debate between two most-likely presidenttial candidates. The objest of a debate like this, is to have the best lies, how many lies you have, and the efficiency of your lies.
This year, Hilary Clinton clearly lied 10 times better than Barack Obama. Therefore she won this years Presidential Debate.
8👍 4👎
Someone who is a master at debating, or arguing.
This person also tends to be an asshole, and is laughed at by friends and enemies alike, because the given nickname sounds like master bater.
Mitchell: I'm the Master Debater.
Mark: *laughs* I bet you are.
25👍 25👎
A non-debate is where a controversial topic generates discussion, but neither side debates with each other in any meaningful way, instead choosing to remain in "camps" on either side of the non-debate, where they will validate each others views.
When they enter the non-debate, they will discuss things not to have their minds change, or to change others minds, they will only discuss to reinforce their own beliefs, since the "opposition" is an inferior mind with inferior views. This leads to both camps becoming echo chambers that exist off of each other, and will continue to grow until both echo chambers have been disassembled, and dismantled.
Person A-"Immigrants are invaders!"
Person B-"Racist! Racist! Racist!"
Person A-"Can you even cuck any harder?"
Person C-"My oh my, look at this great non-debate happening."
3👍 2👎
With negative situations it's always better to be open about them and get them behind you ASAP. If you don't, voters may feel that you're trying to hide something. If your opponent has any sense of campaign tactics you can bet that your opponent has done some "opposition research" on you. It's far better if you take pre-emptive action rather than have your opponent expose the negatives to the voters. You want to be in a position to say that "everyone knows that--it's old news."
Political debate
3👍 2👎