Random
Source Code
Random
The theory that an intelligent pre-human race with entirely black sclera (eyes) evolved to the status of a civilization and technological mastery greater than that of the present human race on the planet earth, the population of which is entirely genetically manipulated and produced by cloning. These aliens/extra-terrestrials may inhabit any number of planets, including in our own solar system, and possess ultimate power over the earth according to the theory. Intelligent apes from before human history according to Brown's Sapient Evolutionary Theory cloned humanity and dominated them as slaves, and presently treat them lower than cats, dogs, and monkeys, treating all human beings as political chess pieces and science experiments.
Brown's Sapient Evolutionary Theory is depressing, but probably true.
Again... If THIS ☝️has been what's happening... And society is collapsing or deteriorating... Then how can you make the claim that the best genes are reproducing?
Hym "Dual gene theory? Jesus Christ... 🤦 ♂️ No. 'The best genes' is clearly just a euphemism for 'fat cock'. Really. It's just... It's getting pathetic at this point. 'Women are trying to find the most competent man' or 'Women are looking for the best genes' give me a break. They want free money so that WORK is optional and to fund whatever enterprise they want to engage in. And they want a fat cock. In their pussy. But not ALL the time. Cervical orgasm wears off after a while, remember? No Cervical orgasm and what are you left with? Just the piece of shit useless retard. Like the cripple! Or Tyrone!"
The idea that any person who has the ability to sleep for an extended period of time will be interrupted by external events that cause you to have a shortened sleep schedule.
My Psych professor taught me about Lauren's Theory today, and it seems to explain why so many people don't receive 8 hours of sleep.
Summary: AI will specifically destroy jobs created by computers in the first place, preserving 'offline' jobs, while minimally impacting work quality, and preserving gross productivity.
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
"I'm a USPS door delivery mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction, my job delivering mail should be fine even if the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly routing addresses and scheduling delivery drivers."
Bijective theory of consciousness which states that a discrete surface area can be divided arbitrarily into an uncountable number of surface areas.
The attention theory of everything propounds that the Vikaasian set of uncountable primes is bijective to the Cantor set of uncountable functions.
Implies that a surface area is a number.
Furthermore implies that a surface area comprises a set of uncountable prime numbers, greater than the set of Godel primes.
Thus surface areas are not only prime; but prime-in-themselves.
Nonononononono... Not talk bitch. And even if it is, we all watched my words bend reality across the globe.
Hym "99% theory. 1% potential for practical application. And as far as needing to talk to people who have done things is concerned, no. I don't. If what I'm saying it is concordant with objective reality then I am CORRECT. Yours if literally an apeal to anecdote. 'You have to accept the anecdotal experience of people regardless of whether or not it's consistent with what generally happens in reality.' Wrong! No I don't. The inverse is actually true. If what generally happens is inconsistent with your anecdotal experience, you need to cede your anecdotal experience as evidence."