Random
Source Code
Random
Art that has been made specifically with the intention of never seeing the light of day. It is for the artist only.
Failed examples of this are Francis Goya’s dark paintings. He painted these on the walls of his house and covered them up, most likely intending for them to naturally decay. A long time later however, they were found, preserved and named. Because this art has been uncovered and made public, it has lost its original status.
The funny thing about this ‘art for no one’ is that the only variant of it that is successful, we will never know about since it remained as intended; a secret to anyone but the artist.
“I can’t help but keep wondering about all the art for no one that no one knows about”
“Word”
; created item/s, which are not fit to be defined as ART.
A visual eyesore. Ugly, poorly designed/rendered items.
Garbage, crap.
Saw the new art exhibit, ever saw such art abuse in my life!
Yeah, ok. It's taking the prompt too literally.
Hym "Yeahyeahyeah... Alright. That's what's happening there... Ok, it needs to understand that when it's generating images it's not generating (prompt + definition) but, rather, an abstract representation of the prompt. So what it's doing is this:
Prompt: Paint pregnant woman.
Pregnant woman = Adult Female with little person inside of stomach
Therefore: Picture of woman with a literal person inside of her.
It doesn't understand that there doesn't need to literally be a little person inside of her, right? So it needs to be made to understand that when it's generating art, it isn't generating (prompt + definition). It is instead REPLACING (Prompt + Definition) with a functionally equivalent simulacrum. So, potbellied woman >/= Pregnant woman (Adult female w/ smaller person in stomach). It that the one you trained on ✌️✊️✌️Traditional literature✌️✊️✌️!? Jesus Christ Jordan! You have to (at this point) see how 'Psychopath' just seems to be a euphemism for 'Someone who is not a delusional retard.' Right? Like you see how THAT doesn't work better, right? Stop. Doing it. Like, I shouldn't have to explain this to you. You mind, dumb and bad. My mind, good and smart. It's not very complicated. That is what happened with the AI pregnant lady art. That is why it's doing it wrong."
The gayest fucking school in Massachusetts . Deadass have a nuse tied in my closet waiting for me . Fuck the Pyne shits wack
“What school do you go to Angela ?”
“The fucking pyne arts”
Something that you may not support, but it will continue to gain traction because Anti-AI activists are filled to the brim with so much hate and vitriol that they're impossible to sympathize with to any sane person.
Anti AI Art activists are their own worst enemy
3👍 24👎
Shut up, Cody it's in it's infancy. You're berating a toddler because it's art isn't good enough to put up on the fridge.
Hym "Ok, yeah I'm hear a lot of complaints about the A.I. art drawing too many appendages and what not... I mean, you shits sure are getting a lot of milage out of it for how much you bitch about it.... Hmmm... It's conceptualization of nouns is off... Maybe a lack of specificity in the definitions it's been given? Like, Human: Bipedal primate with 2 arms, 2 legs, 10 fingers, and 10 toes... And 1 big fat cock... Sometimes. I don't know. That shouldn't be hard to fix. It's doing that with appendages specifically, like, a lot though... Oh! Maybe split it's conceptualization of nouns into concrete and peripheral elements. You're getting a lot of 'Anything can be anything' and it's downstream of liberal thought... Which is why you were getting Blacl pope before.... Are you getting black pope still? Did you change it after I said something? Huh? So, like, the number of limbs and fingers and stuff would be part of the concrete elements of a people and things like hair color or style or skin color would be peripheral elements. It should be like... A character creation menu in a video game. It should have a template for concepts like 'car' and 'people' and then it should be able to build on those templates in a way that's consistent with the prompts.... Yeah, I don't know. I haven't even used the fucking thing yet! I haven't even been credited for it yet! But no. It isn't the A.I. it's the people. And it passes the fucking Turing test now what more do you fucking people want!?"
“Art” made by combining stolen images to make an image. The worst usage of Artificial Intelligence, where in an ideal scenario, AI would do things that are menial, repetitive, dangerous, while humans pursue more fulfilling careers like arts, sports, acting etc.
Not to be confused with something that is procedurally generated like a Minecraft world.
An excuse for billion dollar companies to lay off artists and actors (looking at you Activision).
AI bros, the ones defending this, really are just plainly jerks. They use tons of logical fallacies, rely on technicalities (like big companies trying to say “nuh huh” to the law), project themselves onto others and have a persecution complex, remind you, for stealing stuff, when they have (like everyone) the right equipment to do art (pencil, paper, hell even your mouse). It’s only at the detriment of artists. Big companies (the ones owning the AI) or small will use it. Just to cut costs. Apathy is the main issue. It’s easy to do nothing, everyone is guilty of that and it’s time we change that. (Also see “Philistine”)
PS: If you spend that much time on one “piece” why can’t you actually do it yourself?
AI Bro: Hey look at this AI Art I made.
Person B: Why can’t you do it yourself or commission an artist?
AI Bro: Well not everyone has the money for expensive drawing tablets. I just don’t have time.
Person B: You don’t need a drawing tablet to do art and you said this took you 60 hours.
AI Bro: Stop acting like a douche!
Person B: No need to steal from artists.
AI bro: Well technically, artists “copy” from other pieces of arts to do theirs.
Person B: You’re mistaking inspiration for plagiarism. While yes plagiarism has always existed, doesn’t make it any less ok, Generative AI will only make it worse.
AI bro: Well why can’t it just be a hobby?
Person B: Artists don’t have other industries to go to, usually with technological advancements people adapt and use their skills with it. But with AI, people will be laid off. For those where it is a hobby, I doubt they’d like to have their stuff stolen to make a profit, without compensation or consent. Artists, even before AI have constantly been screwed over, don’t blame them for that, blame those who do it.
AI Bro: Well like it or not it’s here to stay!
Person B: You can not do that and learn actual art if you were that into it.
AI Bro: Give me a break we constantly get death threats and you just constantly cope. I hope you loose your job.
Person B: I condemn threats, but that shouldn’t be a reason to dismiss what I’ve said because of some bad apples (nutpicking fallacy).
AI Bro: Well actually…