Random
Source Code
Random
Something flirty to say after someone describes themself
Jane doe: I'm just that kind of girl
John doe: you sure are
Rick says on camera as I walk out of the kitchen.
Hym " 'Something-Something and Elisa didn't let him respond' Says Greta as I walk in. And 'We're gaslighting you' Says Rick. These are complete coincidences and the fact like things like this happen all time but don't report it or Christians will make up stories about Ghost and Inner Demons to try and undermine the completely legitimate claim that the people around me have collectivized to antagonize me for an undisclosed reason and it doesn't really matter what that reason is because they will just keep watching until they find one and then say 'See! That's why I was doing this thing I'm doing!' And you'll know that they are completely full of shit and they'll know their completely full of shit but it doesn't matter because as long as the Christians and the Jews aren't being antagonized then we don't have a problem, right? And then I murder and rape their kids and cut their eyes out because it's funny to me that they thought they were watching and/or that I wouldn't or don't have a right to retaliate in any way shape or form or I'm crazy!"
A phrase used when your friend group really pisses you off. Usually you need to stop everything your doing and announce that you’re going home
Person 1: you’re a pathetic Fatass, kill yourself
Person 2: well then Screw you guys i’m goin home
used to say that it is now your turn or responsibility.
"it's over to you, the people of Scotland, to decide who should win" -Alex Salmond
A tension breaker towards some angry person. If the angry person couldn't answer this, confused or gets annoyed, you win :). quoted by danjackknife
Person A, "You f**ker!"
Person B, "Are you a forum?"
Person A, "WTF?", continues to be mad
Person B laughs inside
The writer suggests we 'hold up', signalling the xenoliterary statement about to be delivered to us, and him suggesting us to in fact hold up in order to properly process what he is about to say.
It is obvious to anyone the line is not meant to be complimentary, in fact, the statement is intended as an insult!
Now, of course, you ask yourself, "well, who is Nathaniel B? if he's trying to insult him why not compare him to someone we know?".
This is the wrong way to approach the analysis.
Of course, don't feel bad, it takes a learned individual to understand concepts of this nature, especially a concept that flirts so sensitively with the metaphysical.
If the young man were to compare the other man to someone generally perceived as negative, if he'd compared him to an infamous celebrity, or perhaps someone local to the group of people who is known as being less than savoury - there would be no magic.
The real genius here is the fact that we, and seemingly even the audience present, have no idea who this "Nathaniel B" is.
He is an enigma, a John Doe, a D.B Cooper.
So how would it be an insult? Well here's where it becomes Shakespearian.
It is obvious from the man's delivery and intellect - of course, he must be at the top level of literary scholars to think of a line like this on the spot - that he knows who Nathaniel B is.
Effectively with one line he is telling us he created this man, and he is the only one who can judge him, and assumedly his judgement is negative.
Person 1: Hold up, aint you Nathaniel B?
Person 2: what