Juliets are probably the best people you’ll ever meet, They’re fun, funny, awkward in the best way, nice to everybody, philosophical, random, not to mention beautiful. Probably does ballet and is obsessed with a specific, very talented ballerina. In a word, Juliets are immaculate
Person: “What’s your name?”
Juliet: “Juliet”
Person: “You must love Yoshiko”
Juliets are often senseless, they don't think straight. They are animals in bed and they can break your dick. They don't know how to speak correct English and their blunder always include past tense. They are the worst roommate ever. They are often ungrateful they are very very ungrateful. Mad o
This dog is a Juliet
She is a Juliet in nature
Rly mean, hurt my feeling, me hurt, sad now. depressed.
Juliet: *kills*
A nice girl you'll like for a long time, and eventually your friends fall for her too. You confess to her multiple time and she says she feels something back but never does anything about it. She doesn't want to hurt you but isn't interested in you at all. Someone you have to learn to let go, but it takes a really long time.
Juliet doesn't feel anything for me.
Girls named Juliet usually are the sweetest girlfriends and will love you the most but also will give the best handjobs and have the fattest ass and biggest boobs with the skinniest stomach
Romeo and Juliet is originally a novella written by Italian writer Luigi da Porto, who wrote this because he couldn't marry his cousin. It got revised by a monk named Matteo Bandello, then translated to Baguette Language by some French guy, then landed on Arthur Brooke. He then wrote it as a poem with some dark shit featuring Romeo banging his head against the wall, then named it Romeus and Juliet. And of course, Shakespeare read Brooke's work and based his tragedy on it, and we got the version of Romeo and Juliet that almost everyone hates.
Differences:
• The Da Porto novella features a passionate and truly in love Romeo and Giulietta, while the Shakespeare Tragedy has a set of horny teens who thought lust and love are the same. (I kinda blame it for the tragedy's shoddy timeline and Shakespeare turning them into teens.)
• The Shakespeare Tragedy features Tybalt and Mercutio with personalities, while the Da Porto novella only have them as extras.
• The Shakespeare Tragedy had Romeo dying all alone. In the Da Porto novella, he had Romeo dying until Giulietta woke up. (Kinda like Romeo+Juliet.)
To summarize, Romeo e Giulietta by Da Porto was born out of a man's failed love, while Shakespeare's tragedy was born to torment stupid teens while giving tears to Shakespeare Simps.
If you encounter this and experience symptoms such as cringe, brain damage and boredom, find more adaptations or read the novella.
(If symptoms persist, consult the Hungarian Musical Rómeó és Júlia.)
Romeo and Juliet is not cringe. You just watched a bad adaptation of it.
An actually good and simple love story bastardized by an English playwright, featuring a fiery but gentle lady from the Capulets/Cappellettis, a stubborn but passionate lad from the Montagues/Montecchis, poison, secret marriage, dagger, death and sleeping with some old bones.
If only those damn teachers know Romeo and Juliet for what it actually is...