Random
Source Code

answer

"ANSWER NOW TO STOP WAR AND RACISM" is what they say but is really a load of crap. Want us to pull out of iraq and "free" palistein even though it already is.

"Occupation is a crime from iraq to palistain"

by smartazz February 1, 2005

28๐Ÿ‘ 40๐Ÿ‘Ž


Answer

The response to the question of which you do not know.

What is the answer to 100 (times) 5?
Answer:500

by .el-cee. February 3, 2010

27๐Ÿ‘ 37๐Ÿ‘Ž


answer

what they stand for: Act Now To Stop War and End Racism. They are a good group, and have organized a lot of protests, although I have to admit these protests seemed to have no effect whatsoever

The protests are never specific enough. These days, ANY protest is automatically mutated into an anti-irag-war and pro=palestine. The message shouldn't be so diluted. There are always like 10 different ideas and you're not really sure if you went for the right reason

But anywho, answer is great; they strive for equality in the world

by rise up rise against June 13, 2004

23๐Ÿ‘ 29๐Ÿ‘Ž


answer

Is a single or double shot of an alcoholic beveage. IE Goslings Black Seal (Bermuda Rum)

"Ayo dude was drunk off six answers"

by Anonymous July 22, 2003

8๐Ÿ‘ 16๐Ÿ‘Ž


The Answer

Calculated by the most intelligent computer.

The answer to life, the universe, and everything is 42.

by apione May 2, 2005

52๐Ÿ‘ 157๐Ÿ‘Ž


The Answer

1) Nickname for NBA player Allen Iverson
2) Nickname for the biggest prick in Ashford, Bhuwan. Bhuwan is such a big dumb prick, thinking it is "cool" to get drunk at school. Bhuwan is also a big fan of drawing on all of his possessions and himself in magic marker. What a prick.

"The Answer is such a prick, he thinks drawing on himself in magic marker is cool"

by ashfordboi-123 March 5, 2007

52๐Ÿ‘ 158๐Ÿ‘Ž


no answer is good answer

A natural "take-off" of the classic "no news" proverb, this saying refers to when you receive no response to a potentially-controversial or "explosive" message that you had trepidatiously sent to an individual or business/government establishment sometime earlier; the idea here is that if your missive's recipient actually was able to "swallow" or "digest" your message's content without "going ballistic" and hot-headedly sending either a seethingly-angry response or the cops your way, then this indicates that the ultra-careful/tactful word-choices that you'd employed when originally composing your message must have paid off --- the recipient's very lack of any response is actually a response in itself, in that he is indicating to you that your message did not excessively upset him.

In today's heatedly-temperish and highly-emotionally-charged business/social world, merely not stressing out someone with a somewhat-unusual/unorthodox statement/request is a major and "worthy" achievement that puts you "ahead of the curve" just by itself, and so you should count your lucky stars and give yourself a pat on the back for good English-communication skills if you actually receive a merely "neutral" reaction when sending someone a potentially-upsetting message --- no answer is good answer, I always say.

by QuacksO February 12, 2019