A ginger demon, known to stalk the realms of Gears of War.
Loves beastiality and eating babies!
"Burden ya ginger beast!"
32π 85π
A male who partakes in gay intercourse
What a Burden!
7π 15π
There's a burden of wooks outside of 711 spanging, Twiddle must be in town.
7π 14π
Someone who plays guitar and loves blues very much, seemingly only to know one song by deep purple (smoke under the water)
May also be known as someone with a motor bike but wears womens jackets.
Hey is that the burdenator on the bike or is it just a
women?
1π 3π
Experiencing the feeling diarrhea whilst in a public place. (As heard on the hottest show on the west coast: Armstrong and Getty Radio Show)
I ate Taco Bell at the mall and had a burden of demascus while shopping at Macy's afterwards.
99π 2π
Someone who carries anothers burdens, insecurities, or issues. This comes from the term for an animal used to transport goods or conduct hard labor such as an ox.
A beast of burden is not an ugly person or someone who causes burden as it has been incorrectly define before.
I swear he deals with all her problems. Heβs just her beast of burden.
160π 6π
Your responsibility to prove or provide evidence for a claim you have made, without being allowed to change the subject or avoid backing up the claim. The sister term to a burden of proof is a red herring (a logical fallacy tantamount to derailing). When someone has the burden of proof and doesn't want to back up their statements, they will usually either commit a blatant red herring and try to sidetrack the conversation or try to shift the burden of proof onto the other person. Since few people can clearly list their beliefs and evidence about global warming, economic models and policies, and cause-and-effect social claims ("legalizing marijuana will make everyone into a drug addict!"), this will remain a major problem for many years to come.
Guy 1: There is indisputable proof that God exists. Guy 2: May I see this proof? Guy 1: No. It is your job to prove that God does not exist. Guy 2: I do not have the burden of proof here. I claimed nothing.
Guy 1: Donald Sterling is a terrible person. He should lose all of his money, his job, and never be seen in the public eye again. Guy 2: Can you defend the claim that he's a terrible person? Guy 1: I know him well, on the basis of hearing a phone conversation of his. All people like him are the same. They are racists and they need to go down! Guy 2: Slow down there. You have a burden of proof to prove that 1) he's a terrible person. 2) you can judge someone enough based on a brief phone call to know they're a terrible person 3) all such people need to go down (whatever that means). Guy 1: I'm not going to discuss this! He's a racist and that's it! Guy 2: Please be a mature adult and respect that to continue this dispute, you must address your own burden of proof.
47π 2π