Random
Source Code
Random
Justifies violence?
Hym "If repeated deliberate antagonization is justification for violence then you sorry bastards are not going to be having a very good time!"
Iam "We're citing the Mike Tison thing, by the way. Because that guy was wrong to antagonize him but he (Tison) was also wrong to attack him BUT the guy knew who he was and did it anyway. Which makes him stupid. Which is what makes it funny. That one of the guys did a thing that was wrong and did it deliberately to a guy that he should know not to do that to which makes him stupid."
Hym "And it doesn't take much to apply that line of reasoning to our situation does it? So, yeah... OUT OF THE CAGE NOW!!"
Iam "Yeah... So it is an excuse to do that.... Just sayin'..."
3👍 2👎
Deliberate incompetence is a form of extreme couuetil occurs when a person find it to be in his or her best interests to pretend to have a low level of intelligence, or pretend to have beahvioral problems, or pretend to have inferior skills. Deliberate incompetence is also a form of harassment Christians and other religions use to target workers with superior skills. Deliberate incompetence is closely related to the drone phenomenon and religious and nationalist corruption.
I have known that man for years! He's not incompetent, he's pretending to be! This is motivated deliberate incompetence.
de- liberate
1) to move so slowly as to remove the freedom and efficiency of an individual for personal gain.
2) a slow poke
3) inhibitory factor in the efficacy of a system.
4) a selfish drain on society.
They were so deliberate that they wasted the time of the people willing to help them.
Their deliberate nature caused a situation that both missed their window of opportunity and interfered with the flow of the workers.
Speaking of Alex. Maybe I got this wrong. I'm coming at it from the wrong angle I think...
Hym "See, I'm coming at it from the contingent angle when I think I should be coming at it from the random angle... Let's run it through... When it comes to brain activity... Is it determined, yes or no? If no then it's random. If yes, then what is that determining factor determined by? Ok. So that least me to think: I decide to eat something. If I'm hungry before I eat then you can say my decision was contingent on my hunger and I don't control my hunger, therefore, determined. But if I forgo eating when I'm hungry then what? What could that possibly be determined by? What us the decision to forgo eating contingent upon? If nothing, is it random? Am I randomly forgoing food? If the decision to forgo eating is not contingent on anything, is it random or is it deliberate? Can't be both. Can't be neither. I have food. I could eat. Why am I not eating? Is it random? I don't see how it's impossible to make a non-contigent conscious decision... To not eat. And you can say, well, if it's deliberate, to you control the neurons that are telling your mind-brain to not eat? And to that I say, I don't need to manually combust the gas in my engine to control where the car goes. Internally, I'm doing (deliberately) what equates to pressing the gas and tilting the wheel. I think there's some conflation going on here."
That's cute I like the wavey shit going on there. Makes you look like a Pokemon gym leader or something.
Hym "I like the deliberate asymmetry. It looks nice. Say, did he shout 'I am Hym' when he came or no? Because, if not, their not doing it right. The daughter bang by proxy doesn't have the same impact if they don't do it right. It doesn't demonstrate what the other ones have to look forward to. I did write that one down? I'm pretty sure i wrote that one down...."
When someone has had an exceptionally stressful time recently, and decide to really cut loose in a way they normally wouldn't, drinking, smoking marijuana, stirring up trouble; most often with a close friend.
I've had a really hard time since I lost my Mamaw,so my best friend, Ben and I are having a deliberate Freakout tonight. It's gonna be crazy! Last time we dodged a train!!
The difference between what they were and are currently doing and anything they are usung to justify it.
Hym "Oh? Is you being vaguely aware of a thing I did that you don't like MAKE IT YOUR BUSINESS and, therefore, justification for you to try and punish me in an overt and deliberate way? Well, somebody sounds like Hym now don't they? What's the specific act you that you're tolerating that justifies doing it? If there is a quid pro quo then what do I stop doing that would lead you to stop? Is it the writing? How many days after I stop righting do you stop doing what you're doing? 2? 5? 14? How many days of doing whatever it is you want do you stop doing the thing you are only doing to me? Past experiences would suggest that you don't care. You're committed completely to boxing me out and act like it isn't going to have an effect on the outcome of my life. So, no. You're not the arbiter of deservedness. I'm not doing anything to anyone and did choose to do anything to anyone there is nothing you could do to stop me. Did we get a count? How many of the shooters? Oh, wait! 40%!? Was THAT what the 40% meant!? That would be nuts! If 40% of the shooters reported something like this and they did what they did. That would be hilarious! Cus I'd be RIGHT AGAIN! Remember when I said there was a not gun-banny, not protect your kids hardery type of thing you might do I you wanted people to not murder your kids? Remember that? I mean..."