A woman or non-binary person who uses he/him pronouns and is a lesbian. They are not men. Lesbians who use these pronouns may have a disconnect with womanhood. Pronouns do not necessarily mean gender. You are allowed to use whatever pronouns make you comfortable. Stop gatekeeping identities and lesbianism. Hesbians and theysbians are valid.
Person 1: Sarah is a Hesbian.
Person 2: What is that?
Person 1: He is a lesbian who uses he/him pronouns and you should respect his identity.
14👍 15👎
A straight man with soft gay tendencies who would, had not the fit of nature done him a genital wrong, be actually be deemed a woman who loves women.
His love for the gentle things in life aroused suspicion about his sexuality that was totally unfounded, since he was a hapless hesbian unaware of his womanliness.
23👍 112👎
A nb gay woman (lesbian) who uses "he/him" pronouns.
Appears by a misinterpretation of "gender =/= pronouns"
This is born for nb folks, since some are not ok w "they/them".
So: "A non binary person can use binary pronouns, which do not mean they are binary"
Example: a nb person who use "she/her"
Pronouns are meant to indicate what gender the subject is/what's the one which the person identifies the most/is minimally related to. (That's why neopronouns were born).
A person should choose their pronouns in based of how they identify.
"Lesbianism" has always include nb woman/nb persons whose has a minimum of correlation with womanhood.
"He/him" are male-related pronouns. Whoever decides to use them is, in fact, related to manhood or male gender spectrum and/or expression.
We come to the conclusion that "hesbians" are: a contradiction, ignorance about how "pronouns" works, what "lesbianism" is, and a reason why more transphobics r erasing trans rights.
Some defend that there has "always been he/him lesbians". As the "male Victorian lesbians"
Those woman were not "he/him lesbians". They were faking being men, so they could been with their lovers without being murdered. Since, lesbianism were a reason to be executed.
So, again, we come to the same conclusion: a bad use of languaje, tolerance and logic.
Nowadays, there are fools who think "everything is valid", even if it is a contradiction/hurtful for someone/a community/movement etc.
A: Hey, you know i'm a hesbian, right?
B: A what?
A: A lesbian who use he/him pronouns.
B: so you identify yourself as a woman?
A: that's right, a gay woman.
B: but you use a male-related pronouns?
A: you got it well!
B: if you use he/him, should you be called "straight"?
A: No, cuz I'm a woman.
B: But if you are refered as he/him, would it be contradictory? And also, wouldn't you mean by it, you are seeing sex instead of gender, and by that, being transphobic and ignoring how languaje is used and/or what lesbianism is?
A: You are just an ignorant, lesbophobic.
B: Ok, sorry, cool. Did you know i'm vegetarian?
A: But you are eating chicken right now. You cannot be vegetarian.
B: Exactly.
3👍 5👎