Even worse than Murphy’s Law. Farrell’s Theorem states that anything that can go wrong will not gl wrong, just simply do something even worse can happen instead. This also provides comedic effect.
Due t Farrell’s Theorem Franklin missed getting hit by the car, just so the bus behind could obliterate him.
After a fun night when a group of people's guy to girl ratio is uneven and they have to silently and awkwardly decide who is going to be sleeping with who that night
Yeah bro there was four of us guys and only two girls so we used the bitchagorean theorem to decide who was gonna take the L and sleep on the floor.
A theorem created by Harrison Montour on March 22, 2024
X*9+X+9=X9
This theorem works with any Positive, Whole number.
6 times 9 plus 6 plus 9 equals 69 is an example of The Montourian Theorem where X=6
Created in 2021, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals places an emphasis on the vagueness which can be applied to everyday examples. A rectangle, in terms of quadrilaterals, is a specific parallelogram in which each pair of adjacent sides is perpendicular. On the contrary, squares are regular quadrilaterals that have four equal sides, along with four right angles. Using this information, one can identify that squares have more specific conditions than rectangles. Moreover, all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. This means that squares can be viewed as the less vague topic in any situation, due to them being less likely to occur in the world of quadrilaterals. On the other hand, Rectangles can be seen as the more vague topic, due to them requiring less conditions to exist. One could use this when analyzing any given situation. For example, if one was to look at the issue of poverty within the United States, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals could be applied by saying that the general issue of poverty is the rectangle, whereas the issue of homelessness could be seen as the square. The Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals goes further than just rectangles and squares, and if needed, one can apply even more quadrilaterals to further differentiate parts of a situation, by simply increasing the complexity of quadrilaterals and adding them to the comparison.
"That was a crazy game, too bad the defense played so bad. I was just thinking about the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals. The whole team was pretty bad today actually, it's like the team as a whole was the rectangle, but that one turnover in the fourth quarter was definitely the square."
The number of idiots in a crowd is directly proportional to the number of people in it.
Last nights baseball game attracted 20.000 spectators. According to Rickys' Theorem that is a lot of idiots.
The third reich reached a population peak in the late 1930s. According to Rickys' Theorem there's no wonder why things went south from there.
When all else fails, just c.out the answer.
Question: Sort the following array : 5,3,2,4,1.
Ricky: "Fuck, I can't figure it out. I will use Ricky's Theorem."
*c.out << 1,2,3,4,5
*submit
Simply stated; in the public forum, delivery style outperforms content integrity as a potentiator of true communication. In the world of debate, well composed and articulated bullshit, especially when delivered extemporaneously, can stand toe-to-toe with poorly communicated: absolute truth, brilliant insight, inspired wisdom, or even genius-level analysis any day of the week.
Although candidate A clearly has a superior command of the subject matter, they tend to get nervous, and stutter and stammer, and seem to grasp for the right word, while candidate B who is well known for his silky sooth speaking style, broadcast-quality voice, and skill in weaving Improvisational comedy into his responses, once again, Vaughan’s Theorem accurately predicts that B will appear to win the question in spite of demonstrated cluelessness regarding the question that was posed.