Random
Source Code
Random
You don't believe in identity Jordan. You believe in gender roles.
Hym "You don't have an identity beyond breeder/former psychologists. Anything that isn't accepting the gender roles IS
✌️✊️✌️Identity crisis✌️✊️✌️"
The thing you are trying to both steal and obfuscate.
Hym "And when I say obfuscate I mean you are trying to obfuscate what constitutes my identity and then attribute to me (in explicit terms) one that I reject as a precedent to steal anything that could be used as evidence to refute this externally imposed identity."
You don't actually have one, Alex. You have a gender role.
Hym "Your 'Identity' is literally you acting out a role. And now you've created this false dichotomy between doing the gender role and not having an identity. Additionally, people who are higher in trait openness are going to be more fluid in their personality. So you're contradicting the personality literature. That isn't 'not having an identity" it's 'being high in trait openness.' So, that's ridiculous. Are women reliably higher in trait openness? They're reliably more liberal. And liberalism is associated with being higher in trait openness (if I'm remembering correctly). So.... Yeah, that tracks. They're doing it right, I guess. Yeah, no, you lost me at no tattoos. I'm just not going to do that."
Can't be contingent upon arbitrary and peripheral elements of your identity. Because what happens when your societally assigned identity is "nigger?" Your whole thing breaks down at that point. "Incel" is just as arbitrary. But it's always going to be somebody if we accept your definition.
Hym "Your identity can't be Professor-Father-Husband, Jordan. If that were the case, there would be no difference between you and every other Professor-Father-Husband. If it's contingent on your status, your status can be low ARBITRARILY. In the context of determinism, you are the antecedent chain of events leading to the present expressed as a locus of subjectivity. And I'm not standing of the shoulders of anyone, Douglarse. One of us is a giant and the other is a toxic sycophant with a stinky penis."
Alright. Time to get to work.
Hym "No. Your identity does not need to be 'nested in a relationship.' See what I mean about 'The Chosen'? And not Joe Rogan's retarded shit trying to repurpose my shit. They legitimately believe that if a woman hasn't signed off on you, if you haven't been ordained, you don't have an identity. This is what you get when men use woman to validate their existence. Like... No. Identity has nothing to do with being in a relationship. Woman aren't selecting for functionality. Golden state killer had a wife and kids. Wayne gacy had a wife and kids. Ted bundy great with women had intimate relationships (and to the chick that wrote the song in response to this: No if you met Ted bundy you'd be a blue, jizz filled corpse). It also isn't pretend world where you can be tri-gender fox spirit but that's neither here nor there. Your identity is a configuration of traits and deeds, is both internal and external, and what people like to do now-a-days is falsify their identity with the help of others.
Jordan Peterson isn't 'not a charlatan' because he isn't a charlatan. He's 'not charlatan' because the people who are willing to hold water for him are willing to pretend for him. They WON'T pretend that you're a woman if you're a biological male. But they WILL pretend that is motherfucker isn't just making shit up. Like, he's been thrown into this position of faux spiritual leader but it's predicated on false premise that he 'was stabding up for disaffected yound men' and that he 'believes in God'. Neither of which are the case. And now as the self-appointed translator of God's book and the arbiter of sin and when sin is irrelevant, he just males shit up. Because his followers can't think and, therefore, will accept his propositions (whole sale) blindly because they are told by a bought and paid-for media system. Seriously, a guy whose identity IS A FALSEHOOD is telling people what constitutes a 'real' identity. It needs to be 'nested' he says. Why? What about it needs to be nested? What happens if it isn't? Well, people can just make shit up about you or deny your existence. It creates the need FOR YOUR IDENTITY TO BE VALIDATED. That's the purpose of his entire point. His position creates the need for peoples identities to be validated in spite of the fact that your identity is independent from other people. Evidence? You ask? How do I know it's independent from other people? You fail alone and you die alone."
Jordan... It’s subjective either way. You’re not willing to negotiate. No one is. You’ve substantiated every claim I’ve ever made. It isn’t possible for me to NOT be the person I am claiming to be because you are all watching me be perpetually correct (in real time) every time I’ve said anything. I’ve done all of the things I’ve said I’ve done. I am what I say I am. The difference is YOU ARE NOT. YOU need to negotiate your identity because you can’t be better than you are. You wouldn’t be able to get anything. You have to do what you’re doing now. All of you. Because, if you don’t, I’m just better.
Hym “ ‘He is what he says he is 😩 I’m not 😩’ Who am I? Who am I imitating there? What’s the identity of the guy that I’m imitating? You know, there’s no difference between imitation and worship. Fucking fraud. I could have shot you kids in the face for this. What you’re doing here. Right in there little kiddy brains. Every drop of blood spilled and every SINGLE tear shed, you would have absolutely deserved it for this. Enjoy ruling in hell you piece of shit. You did this to everyone. Because I’m not just me. I’m also Hym.”
RESTING IN GOD; DEPENDNG ON GOD, FREE FROM PREFORMANCE
AS I REST IN GOD, I BEGAN TO LOOK LIKE JESUS. IN HIS IMAGE, HAVING HIS IDENTITY WHICH IS THE FATHER, HIMSELF AND HOLY SPIRIT TO GAIN FULL ACCESS TO KINGDOM POWER AND DOMINION.