Random
Source Code

relational edging

it's like the verb form of situationship, when romantic tensions continue between two people, but never fully come to a defined relationship you just keep dragging it out together ...kind of like edging...you keep approaching the climax, but in this case you never do...

Are they togther? No, but they've been relational edging for years

Stop relational edging and just tell him how you feel

by fuzzyrose April 19, 2024


not-related

1- Collateral relative's spouse's ascendant.
2- Collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative.
3- Descendant's spouse's ascendant. Except in the case of the child-in-law's parent, who is the co-parent-in-law.
4- Descendant's spouse's collateral relative.
5- Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's ascendant.
6- Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative.
7- Absence of any type of kinship.

Not-related.

by Zabombini October 7, 2024


not related

-Collateral relative's spouse's ascendant
-Collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative
-Descendant-in-law's ascendant (except: child-in-law's parent = co-parent-in-law)
-Descendant-in-law's collateral relative
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's ascendant
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative
-Stepdescendant-in-law's ascendant (except: stepchild-in-law's parent = step-co-parent-in-law)
-Stepdescendant-in-law's collateral relative
-Collateral relative's spouse's stepascendant
-Collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative's spouse
-Descendant-in-law's stepascendant (except: child-in-law's stepparent = step-co-parent-in-law)
-Descendant-in-law's collateral relative's spouse
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's stepascendant
-Spouse's collateral relative's spouse's collateral relative's spouse
-Stepdescendant-in-law's stepascendant
-Stepdescendant-in-law's collateral relative's spouse
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
-Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
-Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
-Absence of any kinship (nor biological, nor by affinity, nor by indefinite classification, nor by adoption)

Not related.

by Willez May 24, 2023


not related

1- Collateral's spouse's ascendant
2- Collateral's spouse's collateral
3- Descendant's spouse's ascendant (except: child-in-law's parent = co-parent-in-law)
4- Descendant's spouse's collateral
5- Collateral's spouse's ascendant's spouse
6- Collateral's spouse's collateral's spouse
7- Descendant's spouse's ascendant's spouse (except: child-in-law's stepparent = step-co-parent-in-law)
8- Descendant's spouse's collateral's spouse
9- Spouse's collateral's spouse's ascendant
10- Spouse's collateral's spouse's collateral
11- Spouse's descendant's spouse's ascendant (except: stepchild-in-law's parent = step-co-parent-in-law)
12- Spouse's descendant's spouse's collateral
13- Spouse's collateral's spouse's ascendant's spouse
14- Spouse's collateral's spouse's collateral's spouse
15- Spouse's descendant's spouse's ascendant's spouse
16- Spouse's descendant's spouse's collateral's spouse
17- Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
18- Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
19- Relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
20- Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse
21- Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative
22- Spouse's relative's widowed (non biological)'s new spouse's relative's spouse
23- Absence of any kinship (nor biological, nor by affinity, nor by indefinite classification, nor by adoption)

Not related

by Ramparilli June 16, 2023


Race relations

Race relations seemed better and less divided a few years ago, back when the Confederate statues were still around. At least back then, even if they argued at times, they were still talking points. Now that the statues aren't there people are expected to forget history, change, and compromise. That won't make anything better. Before the statues were removed people said they were divisive, but race relations seemed to do well. Now that they've been removed, people really are more divided.

Race relations don't improve if people don't get to discuss history from all angles, even the unpopular (unprofitable) ones. As long as one group wants another group to change, forget, or compromise, things aren't going to get better, they're going to keep getting worse. Sometimes (actually many times throughout history) things were already as good as they were going to get, then people were people, and they still wanted change, and they thought they could do better, and they all fucked it all up. They were all part of the problem.

by Solid Mantis November 11, 2020


Race relations

Race relations seemed better and less divided a few years ago, back when the Confederate statues were still around. At least back then, even if they argued at times, they were still talking points. Now that the statues aren't there people are expected to forget history, change, and compromise. That won't make anything better. Before the statues were removed people said they were divisive, but race relations seemed to do well. Now that they've been removed, people really are more divided.

Race relations don't improve if people don't get to discuss history from all angles, even the unpopular (unprofitable) ones. As long as one group wants another group to change, forget, or compromise, things aren't going to get better, they're going to keep getting worse. Sometimes (actually many times throughout history) things were already as good as they were going to get, then people were people, and they still wanted change, and they thought they could do better, and they all fucked it all up. They were all part of the problem, since everyone is.

by Solid Mantis November 11, 2020


Race relations

Race relations seemed better and less divided a few years ago, back when the Confederate statues were still around. At least back then, even if they argued at times, they were still talking points. Now that the statues aren't there people are expected to forget history, change, and compromise. That won't make anything better. Before the statues were removed people said they were divisive, but race relations seemed to do well. Now that they've been removed, people really are more divided.

Race relations don't improve if people don't get to discuss history from all angles, even the unpopular (unprofitable) ones. As long as one group wants another group to change, forget, or compromise, things aren't going to get better, they're going to keep getting worse. Sometimes (actually many times throughout history) things were already as good as they were going to get, then people were people (doing anything to get what they want, as people do), and they still wanted change, and they thought they could do better, and they all fucked it all up. They were all part of the problem, since everyone is.

by Solid Mantis November 11, 2020