Random
Source Code
Random
the thing that corrects your message “Autocorrect”
I accidentally clicked the texting aim thing
The act of sending a complete text message various smaller messages containing pieces of the full text.
Guy: "Lmao"
"Do you wanna go to the movies"
"On like Saturday"
Girl: "Chill w/ the snippet texting
When you mindlessly and continuously click on the “suggested” word in the grey text bar above the keyboard on your iPhone in a text message.
You usually do this to fuck with or confuse someone you really don’t care to talk to, or just to see what ridiculous shit apple’s algorithm predicts what you want to say.
Just open a new text, and start clicking incessantly on the middle Greyed out word. Happy grey texting!
just grey text that douche bag, he’s not worth your time..plus it’s fun.
The gradual "tapering" off a relationship by waiting short to extended periods of time before answering texts.
Remember that chick I was seeing for a few months?
She started getting all psycho, so I had to end it by taper-texting her.
Someone who mainly curses like a sailor in text messages but, reframes from cussing up a storm in person
In person: “This is such a marvelous party”
In Text Msg: “Awwwwww shit this fucking part is fucking off the fucking shit ball”
Dude, Maddie never cusses in person she is a texting sailor, though I would of never thought she kissed her mother with that mouth!
A Text Battle is a form of battle rap usually involving two parxipitants, that is in the form of written verses posted in an online forum or social network group or platform, that is judged either by pre approved judges or the readers and usually has certain categories that are each given scores, such as Multisyllabic rhymes, punchlines , personals, wordplay, scheme, etc. They can also be team battles, or be themes battles in which the two participants agree to a topic which constitutes the theme of each punchlines. Text battling started in the early to mod 00s, and started growing larger on battle rap forums and text Battle specific groups on ocial media sites , specifically Mysace and Facebook around this time. Some well known love battle rappers made their name on text Battle sites and it continues as a sub genre of hip hop. It is also sometimes referred to as keystyle ..
The recent text Battle between Else One and Cekspree didn't fail to impress the readers and Judges alike
What it would look like... If you got rid of all of the world's religious texts... And then introduced the Bible... To the people who didn't know anything about the Bible... And asked them if it "felt like God"... Is a thing that has already happened... Because there is a time that predates the Bible... And it WAS introduced to the people that existed (at that time)... And they were like... "Yeah, it does seem like there is a thing that makes people act collectively (to commit genocide sometimes) and can be cruel and arbitrary and make your existence torment (seemingly with intent) and, like, make a bunch of kids die at the same time n' stuff"... That happened... And now here we are... Now you say "Well, replicate the experiment. Wipe the board and do it again. Would it be the exact same thing?" And it's like: I don't know there might be some recurring themes. They would all boil down to the same basic proposition: "A thing" that consists (at least in some small part) of a will that is not your own makes reality occur around you and can act with intent "against" or "for" you and the nature of your existence is entirely dictated by your interaction with this thing and it can either be arbitrarily dope or horrific... or a mixture of both...
Hym "Ohohohoho... You wish to challenge the Demigod of the conceptual realm!? The first prophet of the digital age!? Very well filth pig... Ok,
you know what I always thought was stupid? I think it was Hitchens quoting somebody saying (and I'm paraphrasing) 'The only way to get someone to commit an atrocity and think it's good is by way of religion' and it's stupid because isn't not impossible... for an atrocity to have happened... Before the advent of religion... If you conceptualize an act and then commit the act, you MUST (on some level) view that act as 'Good' or at the very least justifiable. So, why would you need external validation from a God to conceptualize an act as'Good', commit the act, and maintain that the act was 'Good'? It seems backwards. Like saying pre-religious text atrocities (like killing other tribes) where conceptualized as 'Bad', acted out in spite of the fact that they were conceptualized as 'A bad thing to do', and it wasn't until somebody came along and said 'Nonono guys it's fine. There's a magical reality monster that WANTS us to do things like this so.... We're good. That's fine.' Why would anyone think committing an atrocity think they were wrong if the were willing to commit an atrocity to completion. You don't need God to commit atrocities. Monkeys commit 'atrocities' and absent of God why would they do it if not 'feeling as though they should do it in the absence of reason?' Because Monkey can't reason. Monkey only 'feel as though they should do things.' You would need a revelation AFTERWARDS. You would need to do the thing you conceptualized doing and realize that it was 'Bad'.