Random
Source Code
Random
this fallacy applies can be applied whenever you decide to end an argument, but the person keeps going over and over.
(you): I'm done arguing you (whomever)!
(whomever): I'm not! blah blah blah blah
(you): Case Closed Fallacy., leave me the hell alone.
Also known as non causa pro causa (non cause for cause/not a cause for a cause) or false cause fallacy
A logical fallacy in which a cause is wrongly defined
Here's the exhaustive list of Questionable Cause Fallacy:
1. Post ergo propter hoc
2. Correlation means causation
3. Texas Sharpshooter
4. Circular cause and consequence
5. Singular cause fallacy
6. Regression fallacy
7. Jumping into conclusions
8. Association fallacy (guilt/honor by association, such as reductio ad Hitlerum/Godwin's Law, reductio ad Stalinum/red-tag/red-bait) {Association Fallacy is an illegitimate child between ad hominem and questionable cause fallacy/false cause fallacy/non causa pro causa}
You are always right. They are always wrong. No matter the situation as long as you pull out the ReeveWho Fallacy, everyone else is wrong and you are in the right. THERE IS NO beating this fallacy as it is the best.
YO WTF ARE YOU SAYING, IM REEVE. I AM THE FALLACY, THIS IS THE REEVEWHO FALLACY.
Dick riding fallacy is when a character you praise or have biased towards a character. and even get offended when people have different opinions about this said character. If they insult you because of your opinion of the character or keep bothering you because of them they commit a dick riding fallacy
“Your character has flaws”
“NO HE DOES NOT AND EVEN IF HE DOES NOT PROVRE IT”
“Damn bro it’s not that serious
“IDGAF PROVE HE HAS FLAWS ILL DEFEND MY CHARACTER NO MATTER WHAT EVEN IF THIER NOT GONNA LET ME HIT.
“Bitch I don’t have to prove it to state it gtf out of my face you just committed a dick riding fallacy.
You assert a Claim So stupid that you make your opponent dead therefore its under the retardation fallacy and your opponent automatically winz
A:superman is outer
The other guy dies and it falls under the Retardation fallacy
A humorous twist on the well-known logical fallacy called the “straw man fallacy”, derived from the iconic straw hat-wearing character Monkey D. Luffy in the popular manga and anime series “One Piece.” In the world of informal logic and debate, “The Luffy Fallacy” involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument by substituting it with a simpler, exaggerated, or caricatured version, similar to how Luffy’s whimsical adventures often lead to exaggerated misunderstandings. This fallacy serves as a reminder to engage in fair and honest discourse, avoiding the temptation to create straw man arguments for the sake of convenience or humor.
Person 1: “I think we should invest more in renewable energy sources to combat climate change.”
Person 2: “Whoa, hold on a sec! So you're saying we should just, like, drop giant rubber bands around the world and bounce energy off them? That sounds crazy!”
Person 1: “Whoa, that's a classic ‘Luffy Fallacy’ right there! I’m all for renewable energy, not rubber bands. Let’s stick to the real world.”
When you Study Something for 6+ Years but have Zero Proof to prove your point.
Person 1: I have studied Flat Earth For 6 Years and Know without a shadow of a doubt Earth is Flat
Person 2: Can you Prove that with any repeatable, tests, experiments, or Observations?
Person 1: I have one picture someone else took but you should just trust me bro because I've been researching for 6 years and don't have any real evidence.
Person 2: That's A Nathan Fallacy