Random
Source Code
Random
When a party guest has nothing in common with you and makes attempts to find out what you are interested in. He may also bring up subjects that really have no interest to anyone. The guest's attempts are lame and superficial. He has no intentions to find out who you really are and does not want to be seen at the party by himself and talking to no one.
"So, what do you think of the cold weather today? Did you catch the big game? What do you do for a living? Did you hear about the towel sale at the mall?"
I had to ditch that guy at the party. He was making lame social conversation.
45👍 4👎
A tumblr blogger that may blame men, white people, skinny people, attractive people, and almost anything for oppressing them and making the world a worse place. Does not seem to engage in any activity that relates to any actual activism, prefers to judge everyone else loudly and type up possibly fictional stories about how they were 'oppressed' that day. Age demographic varies from teens to middle aged adults, mostly females.
Warning: May go off on rage fueled rants about perceived privilege among other things. Do not attempt to reason with it, logic has given way to just feelings alone.
So I went to hang out with an old friend of mine recently and things were going well until I mentioned one of my favorite TV shows, Wilfred. She started going off about how Jason Gann (Wilfred) was sexist and supported rape. I was obviously shocked and in disbelief. She started going on and on about rape culture, white privilege, male privilege, and it was all she could talk about for quite a while. Then she asked me if I had a Tumblr. It turns out that she turned into what some people called a "Tumblr social justice activist".
224👍 34👎
Definately NOT to be confused with someone who is Asocial. AsPD is a Personality Disorder characterised by behaviour which is deemed anti-social such as wreckless driving, superficial charm, pathological lying, criminal versatility, sexual promiscuity and much more.
AsPD is the most difficult personality disorder to treat as it effects people on both a psychological and genetic level.
Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy and Charles Manson had varying forms of Anti-Social Personality Disorder.
66👍 8👎
A Social Justice Couch Potato (SJCP) is a Social Justice Warrior (SJW) that does absolutely nothing about the social injustices they dislike. Most SJW's are actually SJCP's.
"I'm such an Social Justice Warrior."
"No, all you do is sit there and complain. You're more of an Social Justice Couch Potato . . . "
US Central Intelligence Agency
Ben - Did you see the CIA just disclosed the Russians are behind directed energy attacks against official Americans in Havana and elsewhere?
Harold - Dude, we don’t use the term CIA anymore! It’s the “Langley Foundation for Social Betterment”
Ben - Dude, you’re wack.
A derogatory term used to define an obnoxious person (usually associated with the radical left) that pushes their ideology /opnions and/or beliefs and/or lashes out at fellow human beings in an aggressive and controlling manner concerning almost anything that they personally don't agree with usually validating their emotions by them simply being present above rationality not taking into account another persons humanity commonly disregarding a fellow person as a valid human being simply by their expressed viewpoints. A scientifically defined and paradoxically occuring phenomenon in the mindset of people acting like "SJW" is the core idea that they have a valid opinion about certain changes in society that must be followed even tough not using the ability to change themselves coming forth out of selfishness, arrogance, spite for the succesfull and a bad mental hygiene. All in all a crusade type of mentallity that tends to show that they fight for what they think are the dispossessed while not fully realising their own disposition, pretending to be a dispossessed or labeling everyone that doesn't agree with their viewpoints as a (right wing) biggot and/or opressor to justify their own right in doing so. Eventough the term is linked to the radical left it is does not exclude the existence of "SJW" on the radical right thereby it seems the labelling of someone as an "SJW" comes forth more out of a radical interaction with fellow people rather than a political ideology.
-A:"How could you not have voted for Trump? You are the reason why America is going to shit!"
-B:"This person is a typical example of a Radical Right wing "SJW (social Justice Warrior)"."
-A: "Joe Rogan expressed some viewpoints that i don't agree with in a certain soundbit of one of his episodes, what a biggot, he should be cancelled in full!"
-B:"Typical example of a radical left wing "SJW (Social Justice Warrior)"."
11👍 3👎
A conservative who backs the enactment of invasive, usually expensive laws which allow for the government to regulate or micromanage the behavior, relationships or identity of private citizens, or to prohibit government recognition of certain of these traits, based upon the need to "preserve" said individual's idealized "natural" or "godly" order for society (or to create social programs - usually of the "feel good" type - pursuant to such ideals of a "Moral Majority").
Usually a conservative who uses a religious case or justification for why the government must pass legislation (or engage in international conflicts, such as the "War on Drugs") in order to play "moral police" with the citizenry or world.
Such conservatives' self-described credentials as "conservative" are often questioned or sometimes rejected by fiscal conservatives and right-libertarians (including the Grover Norquist anti-tax types) because of such programs take up fiscal resources for potentially never-ending or unwinnable wars. Of course, when culture wars are being fought both in the US and abroad by non-government entities (such as churches), the fiscal conservatives and libertarians are often quiet and compliant for as long as *government* money is not being directed to such wars; the richer of the BGSCs (e.g., Pat Robertson) have free license to carry out such wars.
"The social conservative leaders who advocate using government to achieve their aims always push the GOP to embrace big government whenever the GOP takes power. Here's how it works:
1. Republicans gain control based on promises of limited government.
2. We get a few years of somewhat limited government, especially if the president is a Democrat.
3. We then watch the biggest statists in America -- big government social conservatives -- demand that the federal government "do something" about every perceived social ill in America.
4. We then watch the GOP respond to social con threats by becoming 100% statist. Every time the GOP gains ascendancy, it eventually decides it ought to use the power of the federal government to force "conservative" (in quotes because big government is never conservative) goals. It assumes that other conservatives will just toe the line (like the OP suggests).
5. Voters then kick the GOP out of power.
6. We then watch the GOP at least pretend to believe in small government (many in the coalition will simply wish to limit power of Dems, thus forming an accidental coalition).
7. Repeat"
-- Rich Muny, BigGovernment.com (Breitbart-owned outlet)
29👍 5👎