Random
Source Code
Random
A list of useless information that no one reads. Like, you won't do that stuff anyway, right?
These content guidelines are sooooo long that I'll skip them.
A bunch of bullshit you always skim by.
toobs: holy shit i´d rather die before reading the content guidelines, it would actually eat up half of my lifespan to do.
Urban Dictionary is made by a community of millions, including you. Anybody can post a definition, but in order to keep things fun for everyone, we ask that you follow a few ground rules:
✅
Write for a large audience. When defining a word, make sure to provide enough context for other people to understand what it means and how it’s typically used. Need a little help? Look to our Word of the Day for some examples.
Be creative. Some of the best definitions on Urban Dictionary find humorous ways to poke fun at authority, or put a clever twist on current events. Some of them are just straight up weird. We’re okay with that.
Have fun. We are not a traditional dictionary. This is a place where language has a little more space to be explored and constructed freely, in the moment.
🛑
Don’t post personal information. That includes obvious things like last names and addresses, but we will also remove definitions containing first names or user handles if they can be used to identify and target specific individuals for harassment.
Don’t be an asshole. We are okay with people defining offensive words. After all, people use offensive words in the real world and a resource for understanding what those words mean can be valuable. However, we are not—and never will be—okay with people using a definition to harass, discriminate, and/or directly incite violence against others.
What was the point of putting the Urban Dictionary content guidelines here if there's already just that at the top of the page though?
Content that has no substance, is fake or not original but is passed off as “deep” and “real”
Dinner for Few and Are You Lost in The World Like Me are both Pseudo Deep Content
A person who knowingly reposts another creators content without proper credit given to the original creator. Typically, content poachers will repost another person's content within a few minutes, hours, days or weeks from the date the original posted was made. If the timeline of a repost is longer than 3 months, they are probably not a content poacher by this definition.
They are a content poacher because the last 3 videos I posted they have reposted to their page within a few hours without giving me credit for my work.
Media or literature that is so stupid it does not require a single brain cell to understand the context
“Dude, I’m so high I can only watch brain dead content like on YouTube right now…”