Random
Source Code
Random
Aka. R.A.S.P.; When an individual is only sexually attracted to people who practice same religion as them
Janice is a devout Catholic and she is only sexually attracted to people who also actively practice Catholicism. She has a religiously aligned sexual preference.
What it would look like... If you got rid of all of the world's religious texts... And then introduced the Bible... To the people who didn't know anything about the Bible... And asked them if it "felt like God"... Is a thing that has already happened... Because there is a time that predates the Bible... And it WAS introduced to the people that existed (at that time)... And they were like... "Yeah, it does seem like there is a thing that makes people act collectively (to commit genocide sometimes) and can be cruel and arbitrary and make your existence torment (seemingly with intent) and, like, make a bunch of kids die at the same time n' stuff"... That happened... And now here we are... Now you say "Well, replicate the experiment. Wipe the board and do it again. Would it be the exact same thing?" And it's like: I don't know there might be some recurring themes. They would all boil down to the same basic proposition: "A thing" that consists (at least in some small part) of a will that is not your own makes reality occur around you and can act with intent "against" or "for" you and the nature of your existence is entirely dictated by your interaction with this thing and it can either be arbitrarily dope or horrific... or a mixture of both...
Hym "Ohohohoho... You wish to challenge the Demigod of the conceptual realm!? The first prophet of the digital age!? Very well filth pig... Ok,
you know what I always thought was stupid? I think it was Hitchens quoting somebody saying (and I'm paraphrasing) 'The only way to get someone to commit an atrocity and think it's good is by way of religion' and it's stupid because isn't not impossible... for an atrocity to have happened... Before the advent of religion... If you conceptualize an act and then commit the act, you MUST (on some level) view that act as 'Good' or at the very least justifiable. So, why would you need external validation from a God to conceptualize an act as'Good', commit the act, and maintain that the act was 'Good'? It seems backwards. Like saying pre-religious text atrocities (like killing other tribes) where conceptualized as 'Bad', acted out in spite of the fact that they were conceptualized as 'A bad thing to do', and it wasn't until somebody came along and said 'Nonono guys it's fine. There's a magical reality monster that WANTS us to do things like this so.... We're good. That's fine.' Why would anyone think committing an atrocity think they were wrong if the were willing to commit an atrocity to completion. You don't need God to commit atrocities. Monkeys commit 'atrocities' and absent of God why would they do it if not 'feeling as though they should do it in the absence of reason?' Because Monkey can't reason. Monkey only 'feel as though they should do things.' You would need a revelation AFTERWARDS. You would need to do the thing you conceptualized doing and realize that it was 'Bad'.
Aka. R.O.R.P.; When an individual is romantically attracted to people regardless of what religion they practice
Santiago actively practices Islam, but he is open to dating people who practice other religions. He has a religiously open romantic preference.
The ability to believe whatever the fuck you want no matter if you have evidence or if the claim is ridiculous or outlandish.
Person A: God is real.
Person B: Proof?
Person A: I don't need proof, just respect my belief.
Person B: So if someone said Spongebob was real, you'd respect their belief?
Person A: No.
Person B: Well, then you just have religious privilege.
A person who by determination of social networks is privy to the fact you believe in GOD AND JESUS CHRIST they themselves are atheistic and make an off color spite based comment.
CHARLES THOMAS MUNGER formerly THE TOP EXECUTIVE in BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY says" "social status does not exist " in a YOU TUBE based video interview.
As knowing the fact this individual is suffering from gross indigency , a person leaving a restaurant who is well taken care of makes the most predictable PHONY RELIGIOUS FAITHLESD COMMENT , " PRAY " and that individual being ANAL ALAN answer , " PRAY only exists , if you you self are generous as did it matter a PREY MENACE saved your LIFE in a natural disaster or would you have rather died knowing that fact they were that themselves that kind of low LIFE humanity.
All these ZOMBIE ASSHOLES are running around making PHONY RELIGIOUS FAITHLESS COMMENTS to supposed , " people who in their humble opinion are low life's I SCUM for their human transgressions.
Great intensity of feeling or belief in a religion.
meeting people with a religious ferver is overwhelming.
1👍 3👎
The processes by which society establishes new norms, expectations, and standards, and in some cases existing norms and standards are replaced, in regards to what is and is not acceptable in religious settings. These processes happen in various settings including schools, colleges, businesses, churches, news channels, state governments, federal governments, and homes. These processes can greatly impact how people think, act, and behave in various religious situations.
Yuliana: I wish more religions would be more supportive of giving women equal rights and protections.
Winston: Regrettably that may take a while to occur, the amount of time in which religious normalization occurs in many religions is relatively slow. It could take many years for those types of changes to happen, but the process might be accelerated if more national governments gave women equal rights to men, which would help pressure them into doing it.
Yuliana: I just wish it would happen faster.
Winston: We can always hope that some day more religions will be more supportive of women’s right.
Yuliana: I agree. Hopefully some day more of them will.