Random
Source Code
Random
Shovin xtc up your arse to get a quicker effect through the anal tissue
See: colon rollin'
Jeff wanted a fast high so he gave him self some ass-inserted xtc
Marcy was caught colin rollin' in the bathroom at school
when your mate is chatting someone up in a club and you insert yourself into their conversation, cockblocking and doing your mate a shitty.
fuck off you self inserting piece of shit
that thing you find on ao3 that pisses you off when the author tags it with y/n but its actually just them
"only skibidi alphas have enough courage to write a self insert fanfiction"
An observer and/or participant in an intercourse session --- often the "second" guy/girl in a threesome --- who is tasked with promptly tucking the dude's randomly-swaying woodie back into the chick's love-tunnel whenever it accidentally pops out from his having unintentionally withdrawn it a bit too far prior to his next thrust; this relieves the lovers from irritating pauses in their steamy copulating to semi-blindly fumble back there themselves and re-insert the errant schlong each time.
Finding a willing re-insertion assistant is usually quite easy --- often, you simply need to approach a random passerby and offer him/her a "standard" reward for his/her help: agree to allow the person "a turn of his/her own" with the opposite-gender intercourse-partner afterwards (or at least a post-session hand-job/blowjob from the gal if it's a male assistant), let the person play with the balls and butt-cheeks of the copulating duo for a few moments after each occasion during the "hot 'n' heavy" when his services are required, and/or maybe allow him to give one or both partners a full-body massage --- extra points if you both also give him a nice soothing rub-down in return, of course --- after the session is over.
You're missing the point. If you liking me doesn't translate to or manifest in the form of anything tangible, whether or not you like me is irrelevant. It's not conflation, you've rendered yourself moot. And it's not that what you're saying is untrue BUT it seems to be the cases that anything other than affirming their love of big fat cocks is unacceptable. I'm not doing anything that anybody else isn't doing. And I maintain that my position is and has alway been: I have a right to know what's going on around me. Even if that means the people around me lose a degree of social leverage. It isn't not my responsibility to accept an
imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.
Hym "The problem with the assertion that an outcome is the result of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is that the logical conclusion always leads to an existential superiority claim. Do you *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as hard as an Alaskan crab fisherman? No? So then were does the disproportionate success come from? *insert existential superiority claim* Well, you could say, 'The job has a different "type" of difficulty' BUT are you accounting for mitigating variables in your self assessment? Does association mitigate the 'difficulty' of garnering disproportionate success? Then, why are people so willing to associate with you as opposed to other? *Insert existential superiority claim* So, what is the point of using these amorphous abstractions? It's a convenient out when you're engaged in verbal conflict. You can always drag the conflict down into the realm of semantics at a moments notice. Imagine, we're in conflict over our disparate outcomes. You posit *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as justification for the disparity. I am then forced to either accept your definition of what constitutes *Insert amorphous abstraction here* (Which I have no reason to do because we're in conflict) OR I have convince you that your definition of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is flawed or incongruous with objective reality (Which I will never be able to do because you would never render your own outcome unjustified). It's just a word-trick."
For reason when penis penetration is not done vaginally, orally or anally, but achievement of orgasm is attained by rhythmic rubbing or stroking of penis or vagina through clothing/erotic clothing or other body part of desire.
"non-insertive sex"
Orgasm by repetitive stimulation was achieved through and non- insertive actions.
The first thing you see when you click your account picture
When I want to look at my definitions, the first menu that pops up from the catalog of random definitions is "Hello (Insert Handle Here)