Random
Source Code
Random
Usually used when referring to an individual that has more than one sexual partners or when encouraging someone to have multiple sexual partners
"Beatrice is dating Connor and David at the same time", said Amanda
"Have you ever seen a butterfly with one wing?", replied Bethany
I have a weird fetish for small holes please help this sucks
False information that is typically found and spread on the internet. It is a reference to the "SNAKES HAVE LEGS" video made by Danny Casale.
"Dude, did you hear that people with blonde hair are 34% more likely to spontaneously combust?"
"I don't know man, it kinda sounds like snakes have legs."
Why you want to know how to do this
Basically a guy sucks a girls pussy while kneeling down or on the baby maker
(bed for you uncultured swines) while they moan.
Girlfriend : hey when we reach home suck my pussy when we have sex.
Boyfriend : ok but imma do it hard
Nooooo... YOU should have done what I told you to do BEFORE you indebted yourself millions of dollars to me. You should have taken this seriously.
A retard "We should have..."
Hym "No. You should have done more than sit idly by and risk your kids lives. And this isn't pretending to stop the thing I'M STARTING. I was dealing with it. The TRYING TO STOP IT PART was the ME NOT SAYING ANYTHING FOR YEARS... All I DID... Was speed up the inevitable... And because ME NOT GAINING MATERIALLY and YOU NOT BEING WRONG is more important that you than anything... You MADE UP A FUCKING SYNDROME. I told the truth in the hopes that someone would be smart enough to snuff this out before it became a problem... You aren't very intelligent. And not I won't accept ANYTHING OTHER THAN payment for the thing you stole AND you will address the thing that is happening to me. You could have just done it immediately. AND I DON'T CARE WHAT I SAID OR DID. THIS IS NOT CONTINGENT ON THAT. YOUR KIDS DEATH WILL BE CONTINGENT ON THIS. Don't fucking do this to yourself in the name of being the arbiter of consequences. You'll get you fucking kids murdered AND THEY WILL BE GONE FOREVER."
In the United States, the Miranda warning or famously "You have the right to remain silent" is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials. These rights are often referred to as Miranda rights. The purpose of such notification is to preserve the admissibility of their statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings. The Miranda warning is part of a preventive criminal procedure rule that law enforcement are required to administer to protect an individual who is in custody and subject to direct questioning or its functional equivalent from a violation of their Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination. In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court held that the admission of an elicited incriminating statement by a suspect not informed of these rights violates the Fifth Amendment and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, through the incorporation of these rights into state law. Thus, if law enforcement officials decline to offer a Miranda warning to an individual in their custody, they may interrogate that person and act upon the knowledge gained, but may not ordinarily use that person's statements as evidence against them in a criminal trial.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you have the right to stop answering at any time.