This is a phrase that you would begin with and say when your already giving your best at something and still don't make your goal.
Usually occurs during school tests when you have total confidence and still fail.
What does it take to make the top 10 in our class?!! IVE TRIED EVERYTHING!!
15๐ 2๐
Falls into two categories:
1. What the ladies say they want - sensitive, funny guys who won't treat them like shit, cheat on them, or dump them when a woman with larger breasts becomes available.
2. What the ladies ACTUALLY want (or at least those that they pick) - 'hot' guys with a bad reputation (biker, rock star, felon) who will treat them like shit, cheat on them, and dump them when a woman with larger breasts becomes available.
What the ladies NEED is to say one thing and do the SAME thing
18๐ 3๐
A phrase used by people someone who is confused about something, but mad at the same time.
19๐ 2๐
what she wouldn't say.
unlike the common "that's what she said jokes", that's not what she said can be used when describing an act that she wouldn't do or something she wouldn't like. a reverse innuendo. because a normal audience is thrown off by this, it often results in a more uncomfortable situation.
m: we should bring back the "that's not what she said"
k: I am sure it won't be hard.
(that's not what she said)
m: Yeah, I know, but sometimes you're just not in the mood to do something that hard.
(That is not what she said)
k: This exchange could go on for ages. We need to stop.
(That is not what she said)
m: good call. it is never a good idea to stay up all night doing it.
(that is not what she said)
46๐ 8๐
If one is unable to reasonably understand a statement uttered by someone, the listener says 'What?'.
If, a 2nd time, either due to inaudibility or a heavy, drunken, southern accent (most commonly Kaintucky), the listener is again prevented from comprehending said statement, the listener is again permitted to respond with 'What?' (or, the 2nd time only, listener may substitute 'Huh?').
BUT, if after a 3rd repeat of the same comment by the same auditor, the listener is yet unable to grasp the meaning of several strung-together, nonsensical ramblings, he/she, as pronounced by the three-what rule, is not allowed to say 'What?' again. It is rude. This time, the listener, as deemed appropriate by situation and/or circumstance, must either:
1)reply quietly with 'mmm-hmmm', accompanied by a very slight head nod.
or
2)clearly say 'NO', and shuffle off in the other direction.
Southerner: Ah'm lookin for the pawn (or porn?) shop.
Listener: What?
Southerner: Ah sayed, ah'm lookin for that there pawn (or porn??) shop.
Listner: Huh?
Southerner: Friend. This is a simple question. Where is the pawn (or porn???) shop in this here cowpoke?
Listner (as prescribed by three-what rule): No. <shuffles away disjointly>
44๐ 8๐
a way to answer to a question when you are at a loss for an appropriate response.
charles gibson: do you agree with the bush doctrine?
(long pause)
sarah palin: in what respect, charlie?
48๐ 9๐