Scientific Agnosticism is a scientific movement, based on Techno-Agnosticism, that advocates infinite massive research and studies until find out if God, gods, spiritual beings, supernaturality and extraphysics are real or not, mainly focusing on the development of massive technologies and massive investments for do so, such as the ones of techno-agnosticism. Scientific agnosticism advocates it is impossible to know if gods are real or not according to our current material, technological and scientific conditions. Advocating it is necessary to superate our limitations even more until find out signals that gods, or even extraphysical dimensions and worlds are real or not. It basically advocates similar arguments than Scientific Deism, but instead of just telling neoatheism is taking over and lazyness of scientists. It advocates they are doing wrong research and they should research about gods as they research for aliens. Scientific agnosticism always compares gods and spiritual beings to aliens, even considering that aliens might exist at extraphysical level and the told gods and spiritual beings might be the aliens we are looking for, being necessary the development of massive techno-agnostic technologies for search about them such as the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, advocating techno-agnostic principles for enable the studies of gods and spiritual beings.
"The main difference between scientific agnosticism and scientific deism is that scientific agnosticism has a lot of doubts and hypothesis about gods and spiritual beings, but still considering it is unknown if their existence is real or not, while scientific deism actually claims they are real and they should do massive research for proof their existence, basically both have different mindsets but the same goal. And, scientific agnosticism advocates it is not necessary a lot of people making research at the same time, as scientific deism actually advocates, but just the enough for scientific agnosticism be active as SETI research actually is."
"Scientific agnosticism is just based as scientific deism actually is, both are literally the same thing, different mindsets but the same goal."
1đ 1đ
New agnosticism, also neoagnosticism, militant agnosticism and fundamentalist agnosticism, is a term to describe writers and thinkers that seeks to counter new atheism, state atheism, religious fundamentalism with rational agnostic-pragmatic arguments everywhere and develop technoagnosticism, scientific agnosticism and agnosticology.
"New Agnosticism is a nice movement for counter new atheism, such as new deism also is. Still new agnosticism is under construction and it might take some years until new agnosticism and new deism become a thing, such as agnosticology and deistology."
A stalemate between theism and atheism. Though no unbiased imperial evidence has been presented for support to the presence of a god, the nature of the circular argument of gods and the existence of the âfallacy fallacyâ creates a perpetual state âunknowableâ - where people cannot claim a god exists, but also cannot claim a god does NOT exist, because one canât be 100% sure.
âGoddammit, the arguments for god are completely fallacious but I canât be 100% sure that god doesnât exist. Agnosticism is the dumbest yet logical way to approach things. You know what? Iâm just going to be confident that god doesnât exist but I still wonât claim myself to be a gnostic atheist.â