The General Internet Axiom: "It all leads back to porn in the end."
Example: "I thought I was reading this news blog, but all of a sudden I read something about a stripper that got arrested, and how she just put out a movie. I guess The General Internet Axiom is true."
2đź‘Ť 1đź‘Ž
What? No we don't.
Hym "We don't need to share axioms to for us to communicate. We speak the same language. The utterances and symbols have an intrinsic meaning entirely independent of whether or not I accept your axioms."
A mathematical (and philosophical) theory. Introduced in the early 20th century, it states that if you have a bunch of stuff, you can pick one thing from that stuff, and if you have many different groups of things, you can select one from each group.
This was controversial at the time.
Math is weird.
I have a two bowls of Cap'n Crunch. It took mathematicians until 1904 to figure out that I can take a Crunchberry from each. This is the Axiom of Choice.
A type of axioms of set theory stating a certain kind of “large” infinite cardinal(s) exists. This “large” is not in a sense that n+1 is larger than n, rather like that YHWH being transcendence of us. All known examples are “for now not inconsistent” with ZF(C), and climbing up higher in the hierarchy of large cardinals means gaining more consistency strength in the proper way. Well-knowns are: inaccessible, weekly compact, 0#, measurable, supercompact, and so on.
I proved at late last night the statement is actually consistent! What? Yeah, relative to a large cardinal axiom, of course.
don't ask me where these are from (part of some obscure theological theory somewhere), but here they are, the 4 pillars of existence, order matters:
1. love (for something)
2. absolute ethicality
3. growth
4. logic
Now, what can you do with these? Bring them up in casual conversation...and...what?
guru: these are the axioms of existence, my pupil.
pupil: um, ok, thanks! (ponders) aww, it looks like at the centre of the universe there's love!
guru: ...for something. don't get carried away romanticising. on average, there is love for life management. and, in opposition, at an overwhelming, massive proportion, there is love for experience, not for love as an experience. but yes, you seem to fall into the latter. cute.
don't ask me where these are from (part of some obscure theological theory somewhere), but here they are, the 4 pillars of existence, order matters:
1. love (for something)
2. absolute ethicality
3. growth
4. logic
Now, what can you do with these? Bring them up in casual conversation...and...what?
guru: these are the axioms of existence, my pupil.
pupil: um, ok, thanks! (ponders) aww, it looks like at the centre of the universe there's love!
guru: ...for something. don't get carried away romanticising. on average, there is love for life management. and, in opposition, at an overwhelming, massive proportion, there is love for experience, not for love as an experience. but yes, you seem to fall into the latter. cute.
Marco’s Axiom demonstrated the economic deduction that as more money is devoted to acquiring the Bitcoin, the higher the price goes as what is available at any one time is always only a small portion of the entire supply. This relationship is both infinite and axiomatic, thus even if the buyer had infinite money, it would only necessitate that the price of Bitcoin in that money is also infinite.”
It would be impossible to buy all Bitcoin even with infinite amount of money, it's Marco's Axiom.