Random
Source Code
Random
A manipulative action, move or ploy one partner may use as leverage to gain the upper hand in winning or ending an argument or disagreement without resolving anything.
Jalen: Myckael you have to be able to beat Jennelle at her own game.
Myckael: Jalen you don’t know Jennelle she uses crying as her fight tactics and once I see the water works I’m done.
A manipulative action, move or ploy one partner may use as leverage in order to gain the upper hand in winning and ending an argument or disagreement.
Jalen: Myckael you have be strong the next time you and Jennelle have an argument or disagreement.
Myckael: I know but she uses crying as her fight tactics and she knows once the water works start I’m done.
A manipulative action, move or ploy one partner may use to gain the upper hand in winning or ending an argument or disagreement without really resolving anything.
Jalen: Myckael you have to be able to beat Jennelle at her own game.
Myckael: Jalen you don’t know Jennelle she uses crying as her fight tactics and once I see the water works I’m done.
A manipulative action, move or ploy used by one partner in a fake love relationship as leverage to gain the upper hand in winning and ending an argument or disagreement without resolving anything .Only adding this to the list to argue or disagree the next time. It’s a one-sided toxic mix of mind fuckery and lots of sex to distract you.
You have to be able to beat her at her own game and stop this going back and forth. You act your stuck in a revolving door and you can’t get out.
I know but she uses crying as her fight tactics and once I see the water works I’m done. As far as me being stuck in a revolving door as long as the sex is good I can stuck in it for a little while longer.
A manipulative action, move or ploy used by one partner in a fake love relationship as leverage to gain the upper hand in winning or ending an argument or disagreement without resolving anything. This manipulation is followed up with lots of sex to distract you until the next time you board this repeat roller coaster ride only adding more uncertainty and finally you ask yourself why. The toxic mix of mind fuckery and what you believe is lots of good sex only leaves you feeling more confused, violated and oversexed.
You need to break up with your girl once and for all. No more of the back and forth revolving door.
I know but she uses crying as her fight tactics and once I see her crying it’s a wrap. But the unlimited sex afterwards maybe worth staying a little longer.
A manipulative action, move or ploy by one partner in a fake love relationship used as leverage to gain the upper hand in winning and ending an argument or disagreement without resolving anything. It’s a toxic mix of mind fuckery and lots of sex used a tool to distract you until the next time you have an argument or disagreement on this toxic roller coaster ride you call a relationship.
I don’t know why you and this girl keep going back and forth on the same things. You act like you’re stuck in a revolving door you can’t get out of.
I know but she uses crying as her fight tactics and once I see the water works I’m done. As far as me being stuck in a revolving door as long as the sex is still good I’ll be stuck for a little while longer.
113👍 1👎
A bad-faith debating tactic where the debater selectively rejects commonly understood concepts, systems of classification, or terminology used by their opponent, halting any substantive debate, but supports their own viewpoints using those same concepts.
Instead of evaluating the logic of an opposing argument, the tactical nihilist will feign confusion, and attack a term used by their opponent. If the opponent, unaware of the tactic, takes the debater's apparent confusion in good faith, the conversation is quickly derailed into long discussions where the debater will continually request more and more evidence simply to establish the term's definition or validity, which the debater really understood in the first place. The debater will split every hair, attempt to deconstruct other words and concepts, and request more evidence. The original argument is forgotten and appears to be unaddressed by the opponent, and the debater is then able to feel victorious.
Alice: White people, becoming a dwindling and hated minority in the United States, face challenges as a group and should be allowed to advocate for their interests as a race.
Bob: Race? What even is that, really? And what is white? What about Italians and the Irish? I don't even know what you're talking about.
Alice: Wait, you support black, Hispanic and Asian minority activism. You know what race is, and I've never heard you try to deny or deconstruct any of those other racial identities before. And you sure seem to know what white people are when you're attacking them for white privilege, or when you think there are too many of them. Please stop with the tactical nihilism.
156👍 5👎