Random
Source Code
Random
A portmanteau of technology and antiquity. Techniquity is used to refer to technological antiques, especially those no longer in use or circulation. It can also be applied to periods of time.
The Atari 2600 is a techniquity.
Most of the so-called revolutionary technological inventions of the 1980s would be considered techniquities by today's standards.
The act to intervene during a class with the only specific intention of filling up the time and avoid that the professor may be able to ask questions or change topic.
"Damn, we still have 45 minutes?!"
"Don't worry, I read a couple of papers vaguely connected to it, I'll use the Alawsi-Radice's technique"
The A I U t technique is a power calling ritual that can be used while battling
It can also end the universe
He used the A I U TECHNIQUE to gain power!
It’s when you cum on your women’s chest who is fully Jewish and your fully German and you quickly cum on her chest and stomach and thrown in the over
Oh mein süßer kleiner Bagelschmelz *cums on chest and throws into oven* Geh in den Ofen, Süße
That’s the bagel melt technique
First, you take 4 ice cubes. For a male, you would first shove one up your ass then put two on your testicles, then put one on your "tip" then let it all melt.
For females, take one ice cube then shove it up your ass, then put 2 in your vagina, then finally shove one down your throat.
Wanna see me perform my ice technique? *epicly takes out 4 ice cubes*
A way to decide if a game reviewer actually takes time to play the game/plays the game they are reviewing. Here's an example:
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1: Hey, I found this new youtube channel called Jim Sterling, he is fucking amazing at reviewing games.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.
When you stick it in her soft and wiggle until it gets hard
“Bro me and girl tried the caterpillar technique last night”