Random
Source Code
Random
Actually, Germany didn't declare war on anyone, the US as last. Hitler's aim was to expand towards the east and not to wage war on any western country. The one that declared war on Germany was the UK. (Which had some more reasons, compare: balance of powers, arms race - and don't look it up here.)
In my opinion, France can be considered the country with the greatest losses out of WW2. This whole section is nothing more than telling others your opinion.
Use history books for info about WWII - not google!
23👍 63👎
The "English" version of Omae wa, mou shindeiru.
Friend: Daniel just stole all your chips
You: OMAR LMAO, MY OCEAN DAY VIEW
47👍 1👎
American: "If it weren't for us you'd be speaking German."
The truth: The Americans didn't even join the war until 1944. They didn't hardly do anything at all. The only thing they did was drop an Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagaski, Japan. And unlike you, Britain was in the ALL of the war. And you didn't finish the war. It was us and the Africans.
American view of World War II-
Some American idiot is probably going to Recommend this for Deletion and say that it's inaccurate because they are stupid useless Tossers that take all the credit for something they didn't do.
3👍 6👎
Ever hear of Dunkirk? Or maybe taking paris in one day? you think the english could have staved hitler? hahahahahahahah all england did in world war 2 was appease hitler and give him more land, untill he wanted england.
America did nothing in world war 2, yea right you morons.
30👍 162👎
Seeing the “big picture” of a project or process. Guidance for the overall approach.
Hey Austin, just give me the 50,000 foot view (or any other ridiculous distance) on where we are getting the rams rodded!
6👍 1👎
a goofy ahh youtube channel who uploads gigachad content and never disappoints me and his audience😎
dude 1: HEY BRO IMA WATCH SOME "new account ∙ 7.7B views ∙ 3 seconds ago"!!1111!!1111 dude 2: OMGOGMGGGGOG THATS MY FAVOURITE YTBER W
5👍 1👎
Useless, incompetent, men who are too stupid to know that women "pay the disproportionate cost for sex" which roughly translates to "are better than men". He doesn't give a shit about disaffected men and has nothing but contempt for them. Why? Let's explore."
Hym "You can tell by Jordan Peterson's view of the red pill types that he REALLY doesn't like the fact that MEN control access to relationships. Women already control access to sex but that isn't good enough for him. That's why he's pushing so hard for marriage even though he knows that half of them will fail. He wants them to have control of both. You should have to PAY A PRICE for leaving his daughter. You should have to have a relationship with her to fuck her (even though, history, you just DON'T have to do that). I disagree. I think men should hold a tighter grip on their control of relationships. It's not a "Short term mating strategy". In the words of my highly sexually success friend who lives in his mothers basement AND my highly sexually successful OTHER friend who ALSO lives with his parents and sits and plays video games with me (even going as far to turn down sex to spend his birthday with me) 'I'm looking for 'the one' but, hey, if they want to throw me some ass while I search... Meh 🤷🏿 ♂️' "
3👍 6👎