When you give up at life and smash your keyboard in rage
I HATE THIS GAME AAA A Ag,lđ4 c7ugahrc6qirqlyrio12812 b8o/O(!u
The kind of Music that comes out when acids and bases are neutralised by higher forces.
U.8.Noise..? How does it taste..?
a bitch looking like a monkey married to guy with a forehead of the world
hey you better quit it before u get it
comeback to the boring joke, “who asked”
Chad: who
Tyler: who asked
Kevin: the one who fukd u in da ass
a antonym for the fortnite balls song, kills anybody who is sussy
mohammedontavious: fortnite balls im ga-. chingchongman: apex ass ur les u hate girls u release normal parents. mohammedontavious: *dies of death cutely*
What some may consider a reference to a mythical-magical Christian Jesus, or not, which places emphasis on the fact that often a large part of organized some religion is a money-making scam designed by charismatic and unscrupulous religious-leaders to separate the gullible and poorly educated from their money which greatly overshadows any actual mundane benefits given to the religious community as it instead lines the pockets of and enriches the religious leaders.
Je$u$ wants you to give to the BIG-church so the pastor can get a new Mansion and Jet to seduce his concubines with as he uses the tax code "Every organization exempt from federal income tax under IRS 501(a) must file an annual information return except: 1) A church .... " to remain unaccountable and hide the fact that he is just scamming people from their money instead of using the funds for social good as was intended by the religious exception in the tax code -- make religious institutions accountable by demanding they file an accounting form, like most every other charitable organizations must do, since large and small religious institutions have proven over and over again that they can't police themselves.
The “would-u” is a fraction of one….
The “would-u” is an edible entity,
The “would-u” is part of an ancient English social activity (well, of a sort!)
The “would-u” is the last piece of food on the plate.
Take a group of English individuals in a social setting;
apply a selection of nibbles on a plate, and watch each and every morsel (but one) be devoured.
Yes, all but one…
As the nibbles gets less and less, there will be only one left.
At this point it becomes something more than its parts – it becomes the “would-u”.
As the “would-u” it seems to gain some magic kudos… It NEVER gets eaten… (well, in its entirety… anyway).
It may get broken in half, but still it is a “would-u”.
It may get its topping removed, but it is still a “would-u”.
It may end up being half of a half of a half, but still as a former shadow of what it and its fellow nibbles were, still the “would-u” remains…