Random
Source Code
Random
A lot of sophisticated sounding words covering a flawed, irrational framework.
a particular variety of "begging the question" in which the very things the author criticizes, he also uses to support his own position.
Derived from Social Psychologist/Philosopher John Haidt's attacking arguments against Sam Harris, over Harris' $10,000 challenge for someone to provide a written argument compelling enough to change Harris' mind re: the central premise in the book, "The Moral Landscape."
Exemplified in this article: www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/why-sam-harris-is-unlikely-to-change-his-mind10
Haidt writes early on:
" Nobody has yet found a way to “debias” people—to train people to look for evidence on the other side—once emotions or self-interest are activated."
"Saying human reason is a failure in battling emotions... except when it isn't... is pure Haidt-speech."
Yet later, provides a direct counter example:
"This is why science works so well. Scientists suffer from the confirmation bias like everybody else, but the genius of science as an institution is that it incentivizes scientists to disconfirm each others’ ideas, and it creates a community within which a reasoned consensus eventually emerges."
A required high school class were you seperate yourself from the rest of the class in a seperate computer room with your partner and hear things behind you (such as footsteps and bridgettes).
"How was speech class?"
"Ugh, I kept hearing things."
The native tongue of a group of villagers/ insiders.
Speech was made everyone’s basic human rights whether you like it or not.
You're not NOT PAYING, you're paying someone else and your aiding and abetting a targeted stalking a harassment campaign.
Hym "It isn't a speech issue in the first place, it's about piece of shit content creator parasites establishing online communist dictatorships and then wielding the platform against other people to control the discourse and box people out of public life... OR STEAL THEIR IDENTITY. The state needs to clamp down on these platforms. They also need to clamp down on these non-compete clauses. And the evidence I would use to demonstrate that... Is ME. You're unelected, perversely incentivized, political actors with no oversight other than selectively enforced policies that people like Sniperwolf violate without consequence. Someone is getting paid for this. It isn't the guy who should be getting paid but it is SOMEONE. And you can bitch about the racial and gay slurs but I would like to see you can reconcile your opposition to THOSE with what you're doing to me without using the word 'deserves.' And to that I say 'The guy I'm calling a faggot deserves to be called a faggot.' 'You deserve to have your kids murdered.' It's a 1 to 1 comparison that you're literally on both sides.
It isn't even a debate. The conservatives just wanted to be the ones controlling the discourse. And now they do. None of you should have control of the piblic discourse and the fact that the platform allows you to do this shows that they need to be more subordinate to the laws in the same way corporations need to be more subordinate to the laws. You're going to be a liability issue and this Havana syndrome shit is going to fucking crush you. You're all look like a swarm of gnats flying into a bug zapper. Especially if I have to stab one of these fuck-trophies to get the ball rolling. And Youtube doesn't give a fuck about you enough to protect you. You're friends who were smart enough to NOT DO what you're doing will roll on you to save their own hides because all you vermin care about is making that easy money so you don't have to end up like Hym. You'll get what's coming to you. Don't you worry. If free speech and your constitutional rights aren't superordinate to terms of service then you don't have rights. Literally everything is a business. You can use the fact that EVERY ACTION requires you to go through some kind of business to gerrymander people rights forever."
It's the stalking and harassment and monetary damages that are the problem.
Hym "So, it isn't the speech part and to that I say, we're either doing free speech or we're not. Which means I just get to say whatever I want about the trannies. I'm not ever going to agree that you get to do this and I don't get to say faggot. And there is always resorting to violence. Which is why I think you're so desperate to get the guns. I think you know you're doing shit like this (collectively). I think you ARE the reason you'll never get the billionaire's money. You ARE the reason you'll never get the guns. Because then they'll just be at your mercy. Like me. The politicans are in the same boat. What life would you attribute to them if you had your way? And what happens if you tell them not to associate with me and they do it anyway? You just harass them too? You act like it'll stop at speech and go no further. What happens if people listen to me instead? Here come the cries for deplatforming. Your free speech doesn't work as well as mine so now you need the billionaire YouTube owner and billionaire socia media guys you hate to step in and silence me for you. Now what? They silence me for you and then they give you all their money for redistribution and then you harass me forever and I never resort to stabbing a kid... That's the plan? Can you guess which one of us created A.I. and which one of us didn't?"
To disappear From a large group with a small group so you can smoke some weed. Normally done as prep before the large group, of which you don’t want to be a part of, is about to embark on.
Hey guys - quick safety speech before we start this hike.