Random
Source Code
Random
A person who enjoys cheesy films, such as older plot absent action flicks and B horror movies.
Since you're into like cheeseball action movies like Hard to Kill, Commando, Marked For Death, I 'm assuming you're a Film Rat.
It's that type of film that nobody wants to watch. A film filled with romance, crying, and painful awkwardness. One of the clear signs that you are watching a period film is menstrual blood clashing in all parameters, an exact replica for this scenery is in the Shining movie.
Movie producer: "I want BOOM BAAM SQUASH, so bling bling skeet skeet mathafucka!"
Screen writer: "Oh shit I thought we were going for a Period film"
used on woot.com forums as a polite way of saying the more vulgar "WTF." Often referenced with Manos: Hands of Fate (1966)
"That woot sold out in less than a minute."
"Watching the films?!?"
Any superhero film from the 2010s decade. The 2010s are most notable for having many superhero movies.
The most notable 2010s superhero films are The Dark Knight Rises, The Avengers, Deadpool, The Amazing Spider-Man, and many, many more.
While I agree most superhero movies from the 2010s are overhyped, the 2010s have still been a pretty good time for them (a lot better than the 1990s which many consider the dark age of superhero movies).
From 1945 to 1991 there was the Cold War between the United States, NATO, and the Western world and the Soviet Union, Comintern in Asia, and the Warsaw Pact in Europe.
In 1968, Stanley Kubrick released 2001:A Space Oddesy.
Meanwhile the Space Race was going on between the USA and the USSR, with the Soviets having major wins, leading to the US becoming desperate to get a major win.
Now, here's where we get crazy, because this theory states that the US gov, seeing Kubrick's wonderful job filming space, hired Stanley Kubrick to film the Moon Landing, giving the US a false major win over the Soviets.
There's even a video released after Kubrick's death of him confessing to it.
Now for the debunking.
First off, no member of the world at large had seen video of space, meaning he could've made it look however, and you have to keep in mind this is Kubrick that we're talking about. His films are incredibly well-made with dozens upon dozens of retakes until it's perfect, not to mention the director and extended editions, while the Moon Landing has bad audio and video quality, is short, is fuzzy, and is the polar oppisite of Kubrick's works.
Now at this point you may be thinking "But my name, you said there's video of him confessing to it", well, that video is quite easy to be proven as a hoax -- made by a random guy who moderately looks like 1990s Kubrick --, simple as.
As to why this easily-disprovable conspiracy began, well, that is something I'm still pondering, myself.
Reddit Conspiracy Theorist: Hey man, y'know Stanley Kurbrick Filmed the Moon Landing?!
You, an intellectual: Don't be a fool; everyone knows Hitchcock filmed it
This was originally about 2,400 characters, but I needed to revise it to just 1,500 to publish it, so it's not as enticing, not as in depth, nor does it explain what nations were even in the Comintern or Warsaw Pact, but i encourage you to watch a video on YouTube about this by The Why Files
The type of person to watch paint dry and try to find meaning behind it while using verbose sentences and condescending words to downplay any disagreements on their views of film and television.
Regular viewer: "man, the director really sucks at showing their message."
Film snob: the layers and comprehension of this film are yet to be fully understood and the implications that can be found within the dialouge and narrative that is presented, one foolish person such as yourself can only dream to be explained."
Regular viewer: .....