Jimmy Johnson's word that doesn't really exist.
Irregardless of the fact that Hillary Clinton would have been a better president than Donald Trump, conservatives rigged the election.
2๐ 1๐
Joey: Irregardless, she's a batch.
Beth: Irregardless isn't even a word.
Joey: Yes, it is. It means without lack of disregard.
872๐ 2070๐
you all are a bunch of babies. silverspoon up the derriere 1984 babytalk newspeakers. every word does not have to make sense, thats not the way language evolves. words get their origins from people using the language, they dont originate from a textbook or formula.
i kind of think this word sounds good, irregardless of what you speech nazis think.
31๐ 58๐
Since "regardLESS" means "WITHOUT regard" (ie "no matter what"), then "IRregardless" must mean "WITH regard" (ie "if that's okay").
HUSBAND: I'm going bowling with the guys tonight.
WIFE: No you're not; it's my mother's birthday; we're taking her out to dinner tonight.
HUSBAND: Well, I'm going bowling IRREGARDLESS.
WIFE: No! You will do what I say, or you won't get any for a month!
HUSBAND: What should I wear?
35๐ 69๐
A word contradicting itself, though it never existed prior to 20th-century individuals who began to use it to appear sophisticated, or otherwise literate. The term "regardless," a real word, remains lacking and unknown to such sophisticates.
Teacher: 'Irregardless' is not a word. So, Johnny, please use 'regardless' in a sentence correctly.
Johnny: I fucked datt bitch irregardlessly. There, I used regardless in a sentence. Now, do I get an A?
18๐ 37๐
irr means not.
and regardless means, no matter what i guess.
so i guess it means not meaning no matter what?
whatever, no one uses this word anyways.
it sucks.
irregardless is one of the gayest words.
20๐ 48๐
"Irregardless" is shown to have a definition . . . and it is one word . . . "REGARDLESS"!!! Therefore, the word "irregardless", if used, only shows ones ignorance of the word . . . regardless of their IQ or over-all knowledge ! ! !
There is NO sentence where the word 'irregardless' should be used . . . therefore there is no example to place here ! ! !
2๐ 2๐