Random
Source Code
Random
One who edits written words without pay. An unpaid editor.
Guest editor is an honorary title issued to anyone willing to edit written copy without pay.
@Luvsleeepy is a good editor cuz his shit ain’t stiff
@captinnword is not a good editor cuz black 😕
A ricer, but in photography, graphic design, videography, and motion graphics/animations field instead of automotive field
A telltale signs of Editor Berkelas:
1. They're underages (childrens, pre-teens, and teen-agers, although grown-ass man can do it, too)
2. They're using smartphone and freeware editor apps for smartphones (like iMovie, FilmoraGo, Kinemaster, Premiere Rush, TikTok, Snack Video, Canva, Fotor, etc.), although they can use pirated paid editor apps for smartphones (LumaFusion, Photoshop Mobile, etc.)
3. They're using lame-ass background music and sound effects
4. They have a Dunning-Kruger effect they think they're know everything about photography, graphic design, videography, and motion graphics/animation, even though experts laughing at their (Editor Berkelas) work, i mean, they're smart-ass/smart-aleck/smarty pants
4. There's a fake guru-esque quotes on any of their works
5. They're misusing and abusing effects (such as deep fry), so their works is cringe worthy and dangerous (because some video effects may trigger photosensitive epilepsy)
An editor that thinks adding scanlines, noise and some shitty overlay to some bass boosted song that sounds like dog shit is good
Wow i love this Vergo Editors style i cant see shit and my ears hurt!!!
Massive cock sucking faggatrons
Person 1: The faggatrons keep rejecting my definitions
Person 2: They must be to busy sucking on fat massive cock
Person 3: Y'all must be talking about the Urban Dictionary Editors
Bro that guy is such an urban dictionary editor
The people that reject and approve definitions. Criticized for allowing unfunny sexual "definitions" on non-sexual terms that no one uses in that manner and "definitions" for real-life names.
"Bruh Urban Dictionary Editors aren't even following any sort of guidelines. They accept fake definitions that are either overly sexual for no reason or praise anyone with a certain real-life name that the editor and/or author probably have."