Random
Source Code
Random
A type of baked beans that is not the most popular brand of beans. This is commonly used by Mr Harry Styles
“a different brand of beans than the usual most popular brand of… beans”-Hazza
a Hot Dog that is no longer Hot
dammit, my Hot Dog has become a Different-Temperature Dog (Replace Different-Temperature with a Temperature)
Cold
1. A phrase that means different people like different things.
2. A substitute for the more common colloquial different strokes for different folks
1. I don't understand why John insists on taking the long way home, but different cups of tea for different poodles I guess.
2. I'm not sure what Laura sees in Paul. He's so gross. I guess it just goes to show different cups of tea for different poodles.
When something is pretty much the same but in a different situation.
"Mitch is dating another girl who cheats on him,
Same tiger, different suburb"
"That girl is wearing the same dress that Emily owns.. same tiger, different suburb"
Hym "The difference between the recipe thing and Dr. Peepeestones' thing is that Sam doesn't selectively omit ingredients to prove the text agreeable to his ethical standards. And, in that respect, my criticisms of Dr. Jeepjorp are nearly identical to Bertrand Russell's criticisms of Socrates."
I just learned about a study that showed that toddlers show antagonism towards other toddlers who show anti-social traits are viewed more favorably. And before your a priori presupposition that the antagonist is in the moral right and you say "As they should." That's why I'm famous and an archetypal figure and the greatest writer of all time! Because YOU (Jordan) displayed anti-social personality traits! I've listed them several times. That's how I've curried their favor. That's all it takes. It doesn't matter if your innocent or guilty no one cares. But wait, (because I'm a genius) there's more! So, let's turn the hands of time forward. As a toddler, anti-social traits might be kicking and biting but AFTER they develop a personality then the traits people are going to be SOCIALLY REWARDED for antagonizing are: Low conscientiousness, low agreeableness, high openness, and maybe low agreeableness. That's why "Bullies feel perfectly justified" in antagonizing their victims. Because they are socially rewarded for it by the people who watch. I've deduced the cause and motivation for bullying. I'm a genius.
Dr JeepJorp "I don't know you! I'm not even asking you questions! I don't care!"
Hym "Exactly! But you HAVE referred to me on several occasions. You read a speech that I wrote and you've clearly instructed your followers to do yhe same. Say... What would they find if the got your phone JeepJorp?"
Hym "I mean the differences between us aren't small at all. On morality, at least, we couldn't be more diametrically opposed. Your's is akin to Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism. But I took that a step farther in saying that the idea that 'people have a responsibility to sacrifice for the greater good' isn't something that applies to YOU. It applies to the people to whom you are speaking. You're TEACHING so you don't have to DO. I think Ayn Rands criticism is correct and I think what you do it worse. You're not sacrificing yourself. You're not even willing to risk sacrificing your reputation to associate with certain people. MY morality, on the other hand, is closer to Peter Singer's conceptualization of morally. Meaning 1. If we have the power to stop something bad from happening without losing something of moral significance, then we must do it. 2. Hunger (I would extend this to all forms of privation), disease, and other forms of disability and death (not entirely on board with this one as it's situationally fine i.e. retard molesting whores) are very bad. Ect. (This breakdown of Peter Singer's proposition is from Jeffrey Kaplan's YouTube channel. Go watch the video. I still don't know about the name thing. Some of you clearly don't want to associate with me. Remember that? Remember when I said that? I was right to leave your name out wasn't I? Yeah...)"