Term used to describe the group of useless, pointless lives that mainly go on YouTube, create alias accounts, and go around on completely random videos and say "go to camznow dot com for nude girls". Sometimes they will use different fake IP's. Spammers also send bots out to advertise their crappy channel and comment on others' channels pretending to be their friend, resulting in those people going to the spammers channel. Ususlly paid YouTube partners do this, and for every view they get, they get more money.
On a video about slurpees and video games-
spammer: cool video, but it doesn't have any nude girls! go to CAMAZONCAMS dot COM for nude girls.
video maker: Go f*** yourself and die. *deletes comment & blocks user*
19๐ 205๐
Spamming itself may be defined as the abuse of electronic messaging systems, cybernetic or otherwise (including junk faxing, for example), for the purpose of sending unsolicited bulk messages. In order for spamming to succeed, a disproportionately large quantity must be delivered successfully to its recipients, or there will be an insignificant return. Unfortunately for the spammer, it is exactly that large quantity that renders any individual piece of spam less effective: the moment a large enough number of the same piece of spam is sent, the message becomes identifiable as spam by anti-spamware, forcing the spammer to start from scratch with a new spam tactic. This is the so-called "spammer's paradox".
Good example: the mass E-mailing of online pharmacy advertising created a spammer's paradox in many large corporations because it only took two instances of the same spam reported to their IT departments for the spamblocker immediately to delete the rest.
A crew of ugly fat virgins who live in their mom's basements. There lineup consists of a fat man with herpes on mental disability- a fat 36 year old virgin from texas and a whore mother.
They're nobodies and have no life and sit on urban dictionary 365 days a year leaving comments all day.
The biggest losers you remember are United Spammers.
78๐ 12๐
Someone not willing to let his/her word go unpublished in urban dictionary. So they repeatedly send it back every time it gets voted down
This is getting on ud one way or another (; aka ud spammer
a bunch of people on the wotd comments page who are upset with the recent changes made to the commenting process and made a universal account. or just more anonymous kids on the internet making fun of people knowing they won't be held accountable.
MarkishMark said something retarded (again) and within minutes of his post hundreds of kids posted various threats, insults and witty (sarcasm) name changes such as MarkSKIDMark under the tag of United Spammers.
128๐ 29๐
The name given to a Brawlhalla player who spams their signature moves. Signature moves are unique move used when right clicking on the ground when you have an item. There are 4 different types based on the direction you are moving.
Oh my fucking God sig spammers are so annoying!
Trolls on the internet who go around on various websites such as Yahoo Answers, Amazon, Sodahead, Facebook and every other message board.
They typically give bad reviews to books that do not support their theology, leave nasty comments one any blogs that do not match their theology, and answer questions about beliefs they are against with the intent on ridiculing them.
Religious spammers:
Amazon Book review for "Christian Universalism: Gods Good news for all people".
Review: I have been looking for a book that represents Universalism in a biblical way - that will convince me. This isn't it. There are many references that have an Eastern religious feel, and they made me feel cautious. Not a book that I would recommend to "prove" Universalism beliefs to another believer. I wasn't even persuaded by it. In fact it left me questioning such...
C. Romaella says:
If you're looking for a book that presents universalism in a biblical way, you will NEVER find it because that is the opposite of the Bible's message.
Another review for the book: Don't buy this book. The author doesn't have a leg to stand on Biblically, as he can state a few true cases of mistranslations from the King James that support universalism,
C. Romaella says:
No author can "present" heretical ideas in a way that convinces a spirit-indwelt believer.
Wait a second? didnt this dipshit just leave that same comment twice?
11๐ 1๐