The scale of attraction is the 1-10 rating system of used to describe both men and woman, mainly by physical attractiveness. There may be multiple ratings for one person for different characteristics or parts of body, or just one. It is usually used to simplify the act of describing how one thinks of another's body. Because of this, the rating of one often differs from someone else's rating.
"... so on the scale of attraction, I think Rose is a rocky 6 or 5"
"nah man, the ass is there, but no tits and she has a butter face, I'd give her a 4"
"Jacob's personality is a solid 8, but his looks are a 5"
You want to know? Since men apparently don’t know I will teach you.
Hym “You want to know how to make yourself attractive to women? Here’s what you do: make $100,000 or more a year (or have parents who make that much) OR have a fat cock (Ideally both. BOTH is LITERALLY the ideal). Now, you could say ‘Well, studies show that *blah blah blah*’ but the studies don’t account for the outliers and this does. List all of the qualities you think women are attracted to. Will women select outside of those qualities for a man with a fat cock or $100,000+ a year? Yes. Which is why you see men who don’t meet the criteria that is supposedly required to attract women still attracting women. It’s why you need to rely on the caveat of ‘short term vs long term’ selection. Fat cocks and money.”
When someone takes "go fuck your mother" as literal. Do a bing of this and you might think twice about your 'grosser than gross' jokes as I heard them in 6th grade, An Eye In Shadows implied the grosser than gross cracks to a darker degree as I had implied genetic attraction as an insult. See the thing about "German Siblings Having Four Kids" talk about V. C. Andrews output as creative nonfiction. Dailymail did a piece about a mother doing the nasty with her own son on tape; don't say I warned you if you look this up as I did a pinterest of the article with the hashtag #EEWWWW. In 2003 The Guardian did a piece on the bizarre phenomenon.
Reagan M. of therichest dot com did a list on this weird genetic attraction shit; talk about Flowers in the Attic being creative nonfiction there. V. C. Andrews would be rolling in her grave as these jokers where taking the rule34 implications between brother and sister literally, as I had implied insults at detractors, "you have better luck getting your own mother pregnant." This is under the hashtag on twitter known as puke worthy.