Random
Source Code

boob man

A person (usually male) who most appreciates the breasts of a woman over other parts such as the legs or butt, sometimes to the point of obsession.

Male 1: DAMN! Look at the ass on that girl! Tell me you wouldn't tap that!
Male 2: Mmm, I dunno. I'm more of a boob man, and she's definitely lacking up top.

by Not-that-cool Guy October 31, 2011

106πŸ‘ 6πŸ‘Ž


Lemon Man

Someone who is sexist. If you ever encounter this type of person call them 'Lemon Man.' The Lemon Man saga is also a heartfelt story that should be read by many.

Person1: women shouldn't be allowed to be CEO. They'll just pain their nails all day.

Person2: Listen Lemon Man. Women are amazing and can go through anything we put our mind to. Please keep your gender roles to yourself.

by TeaTimeAe July 21, 2017

102πŸ‘ 6πŸ‘Ž


whos mans is this

A phrase that refers to someone who is a buzzkill, ruining the moment, or pissing you off.

Person 1: Can I see the hw real quick?
Person 2: No, thats cheating
Person 1: Bruh whos mans is this

by shiv1622 January 22, 2017

208πŸ‘ 15πŸ‘Ž


pac-manning

To drive right on the dotted white lane divider, which gives the same effect as Pac-Man eating dots.

"Dude, quit pac-manning, you're gonna hit that car!"

by Ron's Cookies April 25, 2007

3411πŸ‘ 337πŸ‘Ž


Man of Honor

This will not be funny, but you should read it anyways, I honestly advise you.

Please don’t discount this because of the archaic gender specificity.

A man of honor is someone who keeps their word. Who treats it like it means something. They respect themselves, enough to be chiefly interested in two things: self-improvement and honor.

It’s difficult to convey the emotional significance of words in text, so I ask that you view this with the lens of a kind, good human, not your internet facade nor who you reveal yourself to be to others. Read this with the eyes of the only person who knows you best, and who doesn’t lie within.

Self-improvement is a matter of two things: respecting yourself enough to want to make yourself better, and respecting others enough to know that their advice holds a kernel of crystallized experience, experience that, no matter how far above them you think you are, cannot be denied. Everyone has something you can learn from. Life isn’t easy; is it really so strange everybody picks things up along the way?

There are many more things that bring a man of honor really mean. All of these, though, are not things I can tell you, but things you have to learn through reflection and humble perception.
And don’t try to learn alone. If you want to truly understand, you have to talk to someone you respect and whose opinion you value. Have a conversation. I guarantee, as long as you take those words to heart, you’ll be a better person for it.

You are a man of honor, just in that you have read this, and I respect you for it. Now go all the way, and learn what you can.

by TrappedInDyedMirrors September 5, 2019

41πŸ‘ 1πŸ‘Ž


Ladies Man

A ladies man is someone who likes girls and has a lot of friends who just so happen to be girls. Typically, a ladies man is supposed to be someone who's attractive, smooth and masculine (though can be a little flamboyant).

However, a ladies man is far different than a womanizer (meaning player). A womanizer will lie to get a girl's attention; A ladies man will be totally honest; A womanizer doesn't respect women; A ladies man loves women, but shows them respect and is generally good to them.

Friend: "Dude, 4 girls just said hi to you in a row! They're still giggling"
Guy: "What can I say? I'm a ladies man!"

by Keep On Truckin' Peepz June 26, 2015

551πŸ‘ 51πŸ‘Ž


man

Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor homepage. "Rule 3. Publish opinions. Don't reject an entry just because it's opinionated. Opinions are useful to readers unfamiliar with a topic. Don't reject an entry because you disagree or are offended. Don't reject an entry because you think it's inaccurate." It is not sexist as it is a view which can be held by any gender, does not generalise entire groups and does not mention any approval or promotion of discrimination. "Rule 2 Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it." So act with a little integrity, for once.

90% are useless, worthless arseholes who vote up and post misogynistic definitions. when they're not doing that they're probably whining their egocentric hearts out that people are complaining about their stupid misogynistic arses whilst desperately trying to distance themselves from that fact. despite this they'll often either a) not vote down male chauvinism and only recognise sexism exists when (shock, horror!) it's directed at them (useless, worthless arsehole) or b) laugh at misogyny and casual sexism and vote it up. c) the absolute rarity on urbandictionary: feminist male who votes down chauvinistic, masculist sociopathy and who doesn't expect people to simply accept casual chauvinism and irrational prejudice because some other oblivious, privileged arsehole who only empathises with their own interests (fuck you) finds it amusing.

"i laughed my head off at the notion of the delusional man who claimed UD was not a repository of the racist, sexist sentiments of antisocial, teenage white heterosexual males, they need to find a clue. off the top of my head: rape (15 out of 20 pages = misogynistic bullshit), domestic violence, domestic abuse, sexual harassment, patriarchy, women's rights, feminist (5 of 11), feminazi (5 of 8), surprise sex, faggot, dyke, mangina, slut, slut shaming, whore, bitch, cunt, cum dumpster, woman (16 of 20 - chauvinistic bullshit), women (8 of 10), female brain, female logic, 50 facts about women... cba to write any more, you only need to open your oblivious eyes to see what is evident, if you've been an editor you'll also know that almost every other definition that's submitted is a made up sexist term where the female is sexually degraded anyway or something racist/homophobic... which often still gets accepted, DESPITE it being against rule 2 on the editor homepage which states "2. Reject racist and sexist entries. Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it."(pissed off pirate, alabama hot pocket, red sock, anybody?), but what do you expect when 90% of the editors themselves are other egotistical antisocial, teenage white heterosexual males?"

by a censored, inconvenient truth May 12, 2011

6πŸ‘ 54πŸ‘Ž