Random
Source Code
Random
You know what, I'm going to take a different route with this one. I was going to say something else (Which you likely saw) but I'm going to pivot and say this instead: If Forrest Gump is "real" in the same way that the bible is "real" then there is is no REAL moral significance to the moral presuppositions. Additionally, if the book needs to be interpret by someone who doesn't believe in the underlying axioms for people draw accurate conclusions... Then the book itself is not an accurate lens through with to view the world. His entire case for the bible is literally just "What? The glasses your wearing have ink all over them? Don't worry. I'll just tell what's happening." And then he reaches into you wallet and takes your money and then he guides you straight into a wall and walks away.
Hym "Not my problem he says. You just want the moral authority of God for yourself and if you amswer the question honestly you lose it immediately. So you obfuscate the nature of 'truth' and 'real' to appease your own conscience."
Someone who calls the same establishment over and over with no respect or boundaries of the actual establishment. This mainly applies if you work at a call based job and the same person always calls and makes your life more difficult.
Friend: "Wow, Thomas has called 5 times today about random shit we can't help him with"
Me: "Sounds like Thomas is a problem Caller"
When someone applies over 100 layers of fake tan and think they look good. When really it’s streaky and black. Then they start to go green
Fake Tan problem is Also known as an Amber!
A problem that you created so you could fix it so you didn't look as stupid as you really are.
Donald Trumps entire presidency is a Kardashian problem.
Turk Rigid Goblin, or otherwise known as Jerk Chicken Problem, is used to describe those with the sleeping patterns of a delinquent, usually spending days on end in a bedroom.
"Who are we waiting for? It's been time"
"Jerk Chicken Problem"
The implicit instructions given to DEJA VU PORN PATRONS on their movie screen before the PORN SEX FLICK STARTS.
As following what it says on the movie screen as NO SMOKING NO SLEEPING NO PROBLEM as SUCKING , FUCKING and other SEX you like while enjoying the SEX PORN FLICK is greatly encouraged is we would not want you to stay home and watch SEX PORN FLICK with another partner so as the management go ahead and enjoy yourselves.
What is even the logic behind that?
Hym "So, the solution to men's problems is... Men being better... SO... Men (collectively) have problems... But if the men were better they wouldn't have problems... because better men wouldn't be having those problems... So, what are these men's problems? And what constitutes better? Better, like, higher earning? Let's go back to the problems... According the redpillers, men's problems are... Having their lives destroyed by women through divorce, ok? So there's one... Do the better men have that problem? Who are the better men Konstantin? Is Elon one of them? You're on a team where you HAVE to say he's better than everyone Konstantin...
You have to say it... You gotta stroke that retarded cock or you're off the team... Yes he has that problem. Ok, next problem... They're not dating... Why are they not dating? According to the redpillers it's because when they ARE dating them it doesn't lead to sex... It leads to women getting free resources... Why does dating them not lead to sex? Because women are already having all the sex... The men they are fucking don't need to date them... So, the solution is be better. So, what do the dating guys do to be better? Like, there... What do the dating guys do to be better there? Now, I AM going somewhere with this, so stay with me... What other problems do men have? Inflation? Poor working conditions? Is being expendable a problem? So, I guess my point is: Men's problems aren't monolithic. Being better in some vague sense isn't a solution to ANY problem and this is evidenced my LITERALLY ANY INSTANCE of a 'better man' having a 'men's problems.' AND your tribe analogy (I don't think) is even biologically accurate. I once heard some scientists say (on some history channel documentary in relationship to re-populating a species) that you need A MINIMUM of 50 of each sex. So, it's inaccurate and incestuous. Just like you're religion. It's just retarded dawg. That's some retarded shit to say."